2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Models of Early Childhood Caries Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Abstract: In this study, we developed machine learning-based prediction models for early childhood caries and compared their performances with the traditional regression model. We analyzed the data of 4195 children aged 1–5 years from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2007–2018). Moreover, we developed prediction models using the XGBoost (version 1.3.1), random forest, and LightGBM (version 3.1.1) algorithms in addition to logistic regression. Two different methods were applied for variabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researcher yielded an AUROC of 0.74, a sensitivity of 0.67, and a positive predictive value of 0.64. Park Y.H et al [24] obtained AUROC values of LR 0.784, XGBoost 0.785, RF 0.780, and LightGBM 0.780 in a study of children under the age of 5. The results of the proposed study are superior to the results of Karhade, Deepti S. et al [22] and Park Y.H et al [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The researcher yielded an AUROC of 0.74, a sensitivity of 0.67, and a positive predictive value of 0.64. Park Y.H et al [24] obtained AUROC values of LR 0.784, XGBoost 0.785, RF 0.780, and LightGBM 0.780 in a study of children under the age of 5. The results of the proposed study are superior to the results of Karhade, Deepti S. et al [22] and Park Y.H et al [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park Y.H et al [24] obtained AUROC values of LR 0.784, XGBoost 0.785, RF 0.780, and LightGBM 0.780 in a study of children under the age of 5. The results of the proposed study are superior to the results of Karhade, Deepti S. et al [22] and Park Y.H et al [24]. For AUROC, our model result, showed RF 0.96, GBDT 0.95, LR 0.89, SVM 0.90, and LSTM 0.83.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Articles without complete texts, narrative reviews, scoping reviews, letters to the editor, opinion letters, case reports, brief communications, conference proceedings, and non-English language articles (84 articles) were all omitted ( Figure 1 ). Finally, only 25 papers met the qualifying requirements [ 3 , 7 , 10 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this gap in the literature, there is a need to perform large-scale epidemiological research on the association between BMI and dental caries that employs a rigorous protocol regarding BMI cut-off definitions as well as caries assessment including mandatory radiographs in addition to visual inspection and considering the existence of many possible confounders and effect modifiers such as socio-demographics, health-related habits, and metabolic morbidities. While most studies used only statistical models to address the subject, recently, machine learning (ML) approaches in artificial intelligence were used to select the most relevant variables (aka feature selection/feature importance) in identifying root caries [ 25 ] and early childhood caries [ 26 ] using various machine learning as support vector machine, XGBoost and Random Forest [ 25 ], Light Gradient Boosted Machine, logistic regression (including regression-based backward elimination) [ 26 ]. To the best of our knowledge employment of statistical as well as ML models, in the context of BMI categories, cardiometabolic risk factors, and dental caries were not published yet in the English literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%