2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2018.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene cracking pattern through thermodynamic evaluation of products and protonation intermediates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular size of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene (TIPB; critical diameter of 0.95 nm) is too large to enter the 12-ring channels of MOR zeolite, and its reaction only occurs on the external surface. However, the cracking of cumene (critical diameter of 0.68 nm) can take place both on the external surface and inside pores . Thus, here cumene/1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene cracking was used to appraise the change of the internal/external acidity of the 3.0%Ni–HMOR treated with silicon deposition. , As shown in Figure , with the increase of the cycle times of silicon deposition, the SiO 2 -modified sample showed a significantly decreased conversion of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene, while cumene conversion was always kept at a high level (>31.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular size of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene (TIPB; critical diameter of 0.95 nm) is too large to enter the 12-ring channels of MOR zeolite, and its reaction only occurs on the external surface. However, the cracking of cumene (critical diameter of 0.68 nm) can take place both on the external surface and inside pores . Thus, here cumene/1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene cracking was used to appraise the change of the internal/external acidity of the 3.0%Ni–HMOR treated with silicon deposition. , As shown in Figure , with the increase of the cycle times of silicon deposition, the SiO 2 -modified sample showed a significantly decreased conversion of 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene, while cumene conversion was always kept at a high level (>31.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep cracking of 1,3,5-TIPB is a term coined by Hosseinpour et al to describe the formation of cumene (and benzene) arising from the successive dealkylation of DIPB (and cumene) to benzene and propylene. [58,59] Note that a high propylene yield is not indicative of deep cracking as it may simply reflect high 1,3,5-TIPB conversion to diisopropylbenzene, whereas cumene and benzene yields are direct measures of deep cracking. Relationships between deep cracking and mesoporosity are previously discussed for zeolites.…”
Section: Catalytic Cracking Of 135-tipbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main component of the gas obtained from the cracking of TIPB was propylene (C 3 = ), that is formed by the three sequential events starting with the TIPB adsorption on the Brønsted acid site that leads to the formation of the planar carbenium ion ([TIPB] + ) on the catalyst surface, then, followed a bimolecular reaction that leads to the abstraction of an hydride and breaks the C-C bond between the benzene ring and the isopropyl substituent through β scission (Sanchez et al 2019;Qi et al 2011). However, other secondary gas products such as propane (C 3 ), iso-butane (iC 4 ) and iso-pentane (iC 5 ) were obtained (Table 5).…”
Section: Catalytic Performance Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three main reaction products corresponding to the loss of the isopropyl substituent, such as 1,3-diisopropylbenzene (1,3-DIPB), isopropylbenzene (IPB) and benzene were identified, and other aromatic compounds with lower yields such as ethylbenzene (C 8 H 10 ) and 1,2-dimethyl-3-ethylbenzene (C 10 H 14 ) were also analyzed. Following the scheme of successive dealkylation reactions of TIPB for the production of propylene molecules, 1,3-DIPB is formed after the rupture of one σ bond (Sanchez et al 2019;Al-Khattaf and Lasa 2002;Falco et al 2006); however, the 1,4-DIPB isomer was also identified in the PIANO analysis as a secondary product of isomerization. According to data presented in Table 5 1,3-DIPB yields are approximately three times higher than 1,4-DIPB, indicating that approximately a 25% of the 1,3-DIPB was isomerized.…”
Section: Catalytic Performance Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%