2018
DOI: 10.1590/2446-4740.06817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of 3D ground reaction forces during gait based on accelerometer data

Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this study was to predict 3D ground reaction force signals based on accelerometer data during gait, using a feed-forward neural network (MLP). Methods: Seventeen healthy subjects were instructed to walk at a self-selected speed with a 3D accelerometer attached to the distal and anterior part of the shank. A force plate was embedded into the middle of the walkway. MLP neural networks with one hidden layer and three output layers were selected to simulate the anteroposterior (AP), vertic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimum gradient was used as stopping criteria to enhance the model generalisation. These designs align to those of previous studies for similar applications [ 31 , 55 ]. For every subject, each of the four trials was tested in turn.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minimum gradient was used as stopping criteria to enhance the model generalisation. These designs align to those of previous studies for similar applications [ 31 , 55 ]. For every subject, each of the four trials was tested in turn.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Features selected by NCA were fed into separate ANN feedforward models for GRF and COP estimation in each direction. All the models were trained with one hidden layer [ 31 , 55 ]. The model weights and biases were updated through Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation [ 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The errors of the vertical and A-P GRF were comparable to ours (Table 8). Recently, without a great loss of prediction accuracy, the number of IMUs were reduced to two, attached at each shank of the subject [11]. To complement the reduced sensor information, a feed-forward neural network was used to produce the best estimate of the GRFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complement the reduced sensor information, a feed-forward neural network was used to produce the best estimate of the GRFs. In this recent study, however, the training datasets included part of the data from the test subject [11], which may have decreased the prediction accuracy when LOO validation was performed. Because the GRF pattern could differ between subjects [39,40], we used a conservative validation method, by excluding the test subjects' data from the training dataset, and following the LOO validation method to guarantee generalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%