Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This past year, the musculoskeletal tumor surgery literature kept up with the rapidly increasing publication volume in the medical literature. Among the thousands of publications in our field, we highlight a chosen few in this Guest Editorial. We are excited to present remarkable collaborations and exciting innovations. Although the majority of research continues to be retrospective, unique approaches are being developed and international cohesion is apparent by the worldwide collaborations and sharing of prospective data sets. Molecular approaches to diagnosis and treatment have made incremental steps forward, and the use of machine learning in prognosis and diagnosis continues to make strides. Finally, surgical approaches to bone and soft-tissue tumors are becoming better understood through large case series. Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Prognostic Prediction ModelsRecent research has emphasized the crucial role of advanced diagnostic tools and methodologies in improving the prognosis and management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Marques et al. explored how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the histological grade of soft-tissue sarcomas, suggesting that MRI features can provide valuable preoperative insights, potentially guiding treatment strategies 1 . Similarly, Kim et al. explored DNA methylation profiling as a means to classify histologic subtypes and grades in soft-tissue sarcomas 2 . Their findings indicate that this molecular approach can complement traditional histopathological evaluation, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment planning.Survival prediction models are also gaining attention. Yeramosu et al. developed a model to predict 5-year mortality in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, emphasizing factors such as tumor size, patient age, and histological grade 3 . Kamalapathy et al. introduced a machine learning algorithm specifically for predicting 5-year survival in patients with soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma, highlighting the potential of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making 4 . Additionally, Stauss et al. examined the impact of surgical resection margins on outcomes such as local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival, underscoring the importance of achieving clear margins during the surgical procedure to improve patient prognosis 5 . Although the risk factors identified in these prediction model studies are not new, big data and the machine learning approach are important advancements. Specific Soft-Tissue Sarcoma SubtypesAn increasing number of studies are approaching soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes as unique entities. In a Phase-2, international, open-label trial (SPEARHEAD-1), D'Angelo et al. investigated the efficacy of afamitresgene autoleucel in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma 6 . The study demonstrated promising results, with a notable percentage of patients experiencing tumor reduction and manageable safety profiles. This innovative therapy, which involves engineered T-cells targeting specific cancer antigens,...
This past year, the musculoskeletal tumor surgery literature kept up with the rapidly increasing publication volume in the medical literature. Among the thousands of publications in our field, we highlight a chosen few in this Guest Editorial. We are excited to present remarkable collaborations and exciting innovations. Although the majority of research continues to be retrospective, unique approaches are being developed and international cohesion is apparent by the worldwide collaborations and sharing of prospective data sets. Molecular approaches to diagnosis and treatment have made incremental steps forward, and the use of machine learning in prognosis and diagnosis continues to make strides. Finally, surgical approaches to bone and soft-tissue tumors are becoming better understood through large case series. Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Prognostic Prediction ModelsRecent research has emphasized the crucial role of advanced diagnostic tools and methodologies in improving the prognosis and management of soft-tissue sarcomas. Marques et al. explored how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the histological grade of soft-tissue sarcomas, suggesting that MRI features can provide valuable preoperative insights, potentially guiding treatment strategies 1 . Similarly, Kim et al. explored DNA methylation profiling as a means to classify histologic subtypes and grades in soft-tissue sarcomas 2 . Their findings indicate that this molecular approach can complement traditional histopathological evaluation, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment planning.Survival prediction models are also gaining attention. Yeramosu et al. developed a model to predict 5-year mortality in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, emphasizing factors such as tumor size, patient age, and histological grade 3 . Kamalapathy et al. introduced a machine learning algorithm specifically for predicting 5-year survival in patients with soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma, highlighting the potential of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making 4 . Additionally, Stauss et al. examined the impact of surgical resection margins on outcomes such as local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival, underscoring the importance of achieving clear margins during the surgical procedure to improve patient prognosis 5 . Although the risk factors identified in these prediction model studies are not new, big data and the machine learning approach are important advancements. Specific Soft-Tissue Sarcoma SubtypesAn increasing number of studies are approaching soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes as unique entities. In a Phase-2, international, open-label trial (SPEARHEAD-1), D'Angelo et al. investigated the efficacy of afamitresgene autoleucel in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma 6 . The study demonstrated promising results, with a notable percentage of patients experiencing tumor reduction and manageable safety profiles. This innovative therapy, which involves engineered T-cells targeting specific cancer antigens,...
» Artificial intelligence is an umbrella term for computational calculations that are designed to mimic human intelligence and problem-solving capabilities, although in the future, this may become an incomplete definition. Machine learning (ML) encompasses the development of algorithms or predictive models that generate outputs without explicit instructions, assisting in clinical predictions based on large data sets. Deep learning is a subset of ML that utilizes layers of networks that use various inter-relational connections to define and generalize data.» ML algorithms can enhance radiomics techniques for improved image evaluation and diagnosis. While ML shows promise with the advent of radiomics, there are still obstacles to overcome.» Several calculators leveraging ML algorithms have been developed to predict survival in primary sarcomas and metastatic bone disease utilizing patient-specific data. While these models often report exceptionally accurate performance, it is crucial to evaluate their robustness using standardized guidelines.» While increased computing power suggests continuous improvement of ML algorithms, these advancements must be balanced against challenges such as diversifying data, addressing ethical concerns, and enhancing model interpretability.
Predictive models can experience instabilities because of the combination of high-dimensional sparse data and multicollinearity problems. The adaptive Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (adaptive Lasso) and adaptive elastic net were developed using the adaptive weight on penalty term. These adaptive weights are related to the power order of the estimators. Therefore, we concentrate on the power of adaptive weight on these penalty functions. This study purposed to compare the performances of the power of the adaptive Lasso and adaptive elastic net methods under high-dimensional sparse data with multicollinearity. Moreover, we compared the performances of the ridge, Lasso, elastic net, adaptive Lasso, and adaptive elastic net in terms of the mean of the predicted mean squared error (MPMSE) for the simulation study and the classification accuracy for a real-data application. The results of the simulation and the real-data application showed that the square root of the adaptive elastic net performed best on high-dimensional sparse data with multicollinearity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.