2018
DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.11530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Ambulatory Hypertension Based on Clinic Blood Pressure Percentile in Adolescents

Abstract: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more precise measure of blood pressure status than clinic blood pressure, and is currently recommended in the evaluation of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. However, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may not always be available. Our aim was to determine the clinic blood pressure percentile most likely to predict ambulatory hypertension. We evaluated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in 247 adolescents (median age 15.7 years, 63% white, 54% m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After publications of newer AAP nomograms, only a few studies were conducted to predict ambulatory hypertension based on office blood pressure in adolescents. Hamdani et al evaluated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 247 adolescents and found that clinic systolic in the 85th percentile may be the optimal threshold at which ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed (21). The authors also concluded that 2017 clinical practice guidelines have a higher sensitivity for ambulatory hypertension detection when compared with fourth report percentiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After publications of newer AAP nomograms, only a few studies were conducted to predict ambulatory hypertension based on office blood pressure in adolescents. Hamdani et al evaluated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 247 adolescents and found that clinic systolic in the 85th percentile may be the optimal threshold at which ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed (21). The authors also concluded that 2017 clinical practice guidelines have a higher sensitivity for ambulatory hypertension detection when compared with fourth report percentiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is not without limitations, with some major limitations being: (1) The clinical BP was measured by an auscultatory method and ambulatory blood pressure was measured by an oscillatory method, which are not correlated and have restricted reproducibility (21,22); (2) a formal sample size calculation was not done and convenient sample size based on hospital visits over a duration of 2 years was used. A small sample size in the study was another limitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study identified that the cutoff level of office SBP at the 85th percentile had the highest sensitivity (75%) and specificity (81.2%) to predict masked hypertension. Hamdani G et al reported that the 85th percentile of SBP had a sensitivity of 86.8% and a specificity of 57.4% to diagnose ambulatory hypertension in healthy adolescents [29]. As same as the study of Centra et al, office SBP measurement of ≥ 122.5 mmHg that was equal to the 85th percentile of SBP predicted masked hypertension in adults born extreme preterm and extremely LBW with a sensitivity and a specificity of 79% and 74%, respectively [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Hamdani G et al reported that the 85th percentile of SBP had a sensitivity of 86.8% and a speci city of 57.4% to diagnose ambulatory hypertension in healthy adolescents. 29 As same as the study of Centra JC et al, o ce SBP measurement of ≥ 122.5 mmHg that was equal to the 85th percentile of SBP predicted masked hypertension in adults born extreme preterm and extremely LBW with a sensitivity and a speci city of 79% and 74%, respectively. 3 Interestingly, our study found that the prevalence of white-coat hypertension was relatively high at 70% (7/10) and it was higher than previous reports in previously healthy children and adolescents, which estimated 34-58%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%