2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00706-008-0951-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of basicity constants of various pyridines in aqueous solution using a principal component-genetic algorithm-artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The labelling yields obtained for the halopyridine analogues are not directly correlated to their respective pK a values—or the ratio pyridinium/pyridine—although the −I effect of the bromine or iodine atom and its position on the heteroaromatic ring both influence the basicity of the lone pair bearing N atom . The labelling yields reflect the general theory claiming that in the pyridine ring substituted with a halogen atom at the 2‐position or 4‐position, those positions are activated for initial nucleophilic attack, whereas the 3‐position is less favourable .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The labelling yields obtained for the halopyridine analogues are not directly correlated to their respective pK a values—or the ratio pyridinium/pyridine—although the −I effect of the bromine or iodine atom and its position on the heteroaromatic ring both influence the basicity of the lone pair bearing N atom . The labelling yields reflect the general theory claiming that in the pyridine ring substituted with a halogen atom at the 2‐position or 4‐position, those positions are activated for initial nucleophilic attack, whereas the 3‐position is less favourable .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For this purpose, as described in the Experimental section, the data set was randomly divided into three groups: training, validation, and prediction sets consisting of 20, 7, and 7 data points, respectively. The training and validation sets were used for the model generation, and the prediction set was used for the evaluation of the generated model [34][35][36][37][38]. There are no rigorous theoretical principles for choosing the proper network topology, so different structures were tested to obtain the optimal hidden neurons and training cycles [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These give ANNs an advantage over traditional fitting methods for some chemical application. For these reasons in recent years, ANNs have been used in a wide variety of chemical problems [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study compared various publicly available methods using over 2000 experimental data points [15]. Also the more difficult to predict melting points were reported [46], as well as pKa neural network methods [47]. Very recently a neural network based approach was reported for the calculation of molecular energies, claiming less than 3 kJ/mole (0.6 kcal/mole) difference between DFT results and the neural network method [48].…”
Section: Qspr Methods Using Molecular Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%