2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-016-0462-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of blast-produced ground vibration using particle swarm optimization

Abstract: work, a database including 80 data sets was collected, and the values of the maximum charge weight used per delay (W), distance between blast-point and monitoring station (D) and peak particle velocity (PPV) were measured. To develop the PSO models, PPV was used as output parameter, while W and D were used as input parameters. To check the performance of the proposed PSO models, multiple linear regression (MLR) model and United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) equation were also developed. Accuracy of models esta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Khandelwal, Singh [34] ANN R 2 = 0.986; MAE = 0.196 Khandelwal et al [35] SVM R 2 = 0.955; MAE = 0.226 Saadat et al [36] ANN-LM R 2 = 0.957; MSE = 0.000722 Hajihassani et al [37] ICA-ANN R 2 = 0.976 Hajihassani et al [38] PSO-ANN R 2 = 0.89; MSE = 0.038 Amiri et al [39] ANN-KNN R 2 = 0.88; RMSE = 0.54; VAF = 87.84 Hasanipanah et al [40] CART R 2 = 0.95; RMSE = 0.17; NS = 0.948 Hasanipanah et al [41] PSO-power R 2 = 0.938; RMSE = 0.24; VARE = 0.13; NS = 0.94 Taheri et al [42] ABC-ANN R 2 = 0.92; RMSE = 0.22; MAPE = 4.26 Faradonbeh, Monjezi [43] GEP-COA R 2 = 0.874; RMSE = 6.732; MAE = 5.164…”
Section: Reference Methods Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khandelwal, Singh [34] ANN R 2 = 0.986; MAE = 0.196 Khandelwal et al [35] SVM R 2 = 0.955; MAE = 0.226 Saadat et al [36] ANN-LM R 2 = 0.957; MSE = 0.000722 Hajihassani et al [37] ICA-ANN R 2 = 0.976 Hajihassani et al [38] PSO-ANN R 2 = 0.89; MSE = 0.038 Amiri et al [39] ANN-KNN R 2 = 0.88; RMSE = 0.54; VAF = 87.84 Hasanipanah et al [40] CART R 2 = 0.95; RMSE = 0.17; NS = 0.948 Hasanipanah et al [41] PSO-power R 2 = 0.938; RMSE = 0.24; VARE = 0.13; NS = 0.94 Taheri et al [42] ABC-ANN R 2 = 0.92; RMSE = 0.22; MAPE = 4.26 Faradonbeh, Monjezi [43] GEP-COA R 2 = 0.874; RMSE = 6.732; MAE = 5.164…”
Section: Reference Methods Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, an RF model and a HHO-RF model were developed to establish a stable and accurate relationship between the input variables (f, B, T, D V , D H , Q total , Q max ) and output variable (PPV). To evaluate the predictive performance, three performance indices including RMSE, R 2 and MAE, were introduced and utilized here [64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSO algorithm is inspired by the behavior of social organisms in groups, such as bird and fish schooling or ant colonies. It has been applied to numerous areas and has been shown to be capable of solving multidimensional optimization problems effectively (see [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] and the references therein). Another challenge encountered in the shape fitting process is to compute the Euclidean distance (also called L2 distance) between an observation and a given shape equation in or space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%