2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of breakthrough curves in a fixed-bed column based on normalized Gudermannian and error functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown in the figures illustrate the goodness of fit and, equally important, that the variation in the output can be explained by the input variables as the residual data points are scattered randomly around the zero line, which supports the validity of the trained model (i.e., there is no observable trend or nonrandomness in the residuals [51,52]).…”
Section: Residual Plotmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The results shown in the figures illustrate the goodness of fit and, equally important, that the variation in the output can be explained by the input variables as the residual data points are scattered randomly around the zero line, which supports the validity of the trained model (i.e., there is no observable trend or nonrandomness in the residuals [51,52]).…”
Section: Residual Plotmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In this study, Bohart-Adams, Thomas, Yoon-Nelson, Dose-Response, and Clark equations were used to examine the dynamic adsorption characteristics of AA in a fixed bed column [34][35][36][37][38]. Although the above-mentioned equations are mathematically simple and have limited model parameters, they are widely used in fixed-bed column breakthrough curve modeling studies because they show excellent fitting results [33,39]. The parameter values of each of the above-mentioned formulas were obtained using the Nelder-Mead method [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the several simplified breakthrough models, in our study, a simplified, normalized error breakthrough model (Hu et al, 2021) was utilized to model the monotone and S shaped breakthrough curves using Equation (11) with parameters k $k$ and τ $\tau $ to determine the degree of curvature and the location of the curve respectively. cc0=12(1+erf[k(tτ)]) $\frac{c}{{c}_{0}}=\frac{1}{2}(1+\text{erf}[k(t-\tau )])$ erf(t)=2π0tet2italicdtitalic, $\text{erf}(t)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi }}{\int }_{0}^{t}{e}^{{-t}^{2}}{dt}{,}$Where, the error function was defined by Equation (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the several simplified breakthrough models, in our study, a simplified, normalized error breakthrough model (Hu et al, 2021) was utilized to model the monotone and S shaped breakthrough curves using Equation (11) with parameters k and τ to determine the degree of curvature and the location of the curve respectively.…”
Section: Empirical Modeling Of Continuous Pcc Protein a Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%