2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46828-6_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence Using Ensemble Machine Learning Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, Approach-6 with 96.59% of precisions and 97.70% of F1-scores single-handedly, as well as Approach-5 (i.e., DNN only) and Approach-6, both with 98.84% of sensitivities and Approach-6 and Approach-8 (i.e., DNN with Majority Voting), both with 84.62% of specificities also outperform other suggested ensemble approaches and is therefore "Approach-6" is considered to be the proposed ensemble approach. [10] 76.26 ----Sakri et al [11] 81.3 -93.4 63.25 -Chakradeo et al [12] 97.93 93.36 91.00 --Gu et al [13] 91.62 -90.28 -89.39 Goyal et al [14] 85.18 100.0 100.0 100.0 Dawangliani et al [15] 82.80 81.9 82.8 -82.3 Yang et al [16] 97.…”
Section: Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, Approach-6 with 96.59% of precisions and 97.70% of F1-scores single-handedly, as well as Approach-5 (i.e., DNN only) and Approach-6, both with 98.84% of sensitivities and Approach-6 and Approach-8 (i.e., DNN with Majority Voting), both with 84.62% of specificities also outperform other suggested ensemble approaches and is therefore "Approach-6" is considered to be the proposed ensemble approach. [10] 76.26 ----Sakri et al [11] 81.3 -93.4 63.25 -Chakradeo et al [12] 97.93 93.36 91.00 --Gu et al [13] 91.62 -90.28 -89.39 Goyal et al [14] 85.18 100.0 100.0 100.0 Dawangliani et al [15] 82.80 81.9 82.8 -82.3 Yang et al [16] 97.…”
Section: Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They resulted in 85.18% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% precision, and 100% recall. Dawangliani et al [15] developed a prediction of breast cancer recurrence considering ensemble ML approaches on breast cancer datasets. They resulted in 82.807% accuracy, 0.828 Tp rate, 0.534 Fp rates, 81.9% precision, 82.8% recall, 82.3% F-measure, and 79.6% ROC Area.…”
Section: Rana Et Al [9] Introduced a Breast Cancer Diagnosis And Recu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed a perfect score of 85.18 percent accuracy, a perfect score of 100% sensitivity, and a perfect score of 100% specificity. Dawangliani et al [12] proposed a prediction system using ML methods applied to breast cancer datasets. These factors influenced the following outcomes: ROC area: 79.6%, accuracy: 81.9%, recall: 82.8%, time to peak: 0.828, and false positive rate: 0.534.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is claimed that these technologies may minimize diagnostic errors and discrepancies among observers at any level of prediction, prognosis, and treatment. Therefore, diagnostic and prognostic models can help identify at-risk patients and adopt the most effective support and treatment programs (3,(19)(20)(21). Machine learning (ML), a branch of AI, can extract high-quality knowledge and patterns from a substantial raw dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%