2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0548-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of California Bearing Ratio from Index Properties of Soils Using Parametric and Non-parametric Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CBR test was originally introduced by the California Highway Department, during World War-II, and was subsequently adopted widely as a standard method for soil strength and bearing capacity evaluation [8], obtained using either ASTM Standard D-1883-05 or BS 1377 [9]. Laboratory tests are performed on compacted soil samples with OMC in un-soaked and soaked conditions, and they can also be carried out on natural soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBR test was originally introduced by the California Highway Department, during World War-II, and was subsequently adopted widely as a standard method for soil strength and bearing capacity evaluation [8], obtained using either ASTM Standard D-1883-05 or BS 1377 [9]. Laboratory tests are performed on compacted soil samples with OMC in un-soaked and soaked conditions, and they can also be carried out on natural soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, many scholars have used statistical methods and proposed simple and multiple regressions to estimate CBR values. (Rehman et al, 2017;González Farias et al, 2018;Katte et al, 2019;Haupt et al, 2021). Black (1962) predicted CBR from the Plastic and Liquid Index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that multivariate adaptive regression splines with piecewise linear models achieved the highest level of accuracy with a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of 0.969. On the other hand, this study analysed most of works where ML techniques were applied to predict the CBR value [11,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The study concluded that the works conducted with small datasets (consisting of fewer than 160 data points) exhibited higher predictive accuracies, with R 2 values between 0.81 and 1.00, in contrast to the studies conducted with larger datasets ranging from 358 to 389 soil test results [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%