1986
DOI: 10.1021/i300022a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of cetane number of diesel fuels from carbon type structural composition determined by proton NMR spectroscopy

Abstract: The relationship between ignition quality and carbon type structure of fuels is summarized, and carbon groups that have dominant effect on ignition quality of the diesel fuels are identified. A scheme of characterizing the chemistry of hydrocarbon fuels in terms of these carbon groups using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been proposed. Through the use of this analysis technique on 67 different diesel fuels, whose cetane numbers were determined on a number of standard cetane rating engines, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10) were all recorded. The peaks for methylene and methyl protons were located at 1.2-1.25 and 0.85-0.95 ppm respectively, in line with previous work 42 .…”
Section: H Nmr Spectrasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…10) were all recorded. The peaks for methylene and methyl protons were located at 1.2-1.25 and 0.85-0.95 ppm respectively, in line with previous work 42 .…”
Section: H Nmr Spectrasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several methods and correlations have been developed to predict ignition quality (i.e. D/CN) of n-paraffins [41], pure hydrocarbons [35,37,[42][43][44], blends of pure hydrocarbons [37], oxygenated hydrocarbons [34,39,[45][46][47], diesel fuels [36,37,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], synthetic diesels [59], biofuel candidates [33], furanic biofuel additives [16] and biodiesel [38,[60][61][62]. The D/CN prediction models reported in the literature have used both physical and chemical properties of the fuel as model inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical properties like density [36], viscosity [63], distillation characteristics [36] and aniline point [57] have been used. Molecular structure based techniques like quantitative structure property relationships (QSPR) [16,34,35,42,44], group contribution [39,43], hydrocarbon lumps [54], functional groups [37,58,59,64], carbon groups [53] and principal component analysis [45], have also been employed for predicting D/CN. Analytical techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [37,45,51,53,58,65], gas chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) [56], near infra-red spectroscopy (NIR) [50] and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [51] have also found applications in developing chemical composition based techniques for D/CN prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ASTM D613 method is the widely accepted test method for CN, it exhibits several inherent disadvantages, including a considerable amount of fuel sample requirement (*1 L), a time-consuming process, a relatively high reproducibility error, and a relatively high cost [4]. Therefore, there have been many attempts to develop theoretical models to predict the CN quickly and reliably from bulk properties of diesel such as density, viscosity, aniline point, distillation temperatures, chemical composition, saponification number, iodine value, and so on [5][6][7][8]. Ladommatos et al [7] tested the accuracy of 22 equations for predicting the CN of diesel from the above mentioned properties, by comparing the predicted values of 563 fuels with the measured values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%