Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete by Using Random Forest Algorithm

Verma, Manvendra; Upreti, Kamal; Khan, Mohammad Rafeek; Alam, Mohammad Shabbir; Ghosh, Soumi; Singh, Prashant

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0_14

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 7 illustrates the percentage difference between each of the concrete mixes and M1, which serves as the reference Mix. In the recent research, predict the strength by using machine learning techniques without destructive tests [25,[69][70][71][72][73][74].…”

Section: Compressive Strength Apllied Load or Force Cross Sectional Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the properties of recycled aggregates concrete with lime and metakaolin

Verma,

Chouksey,

Meena

et al. 2023

Mater. Res. Express

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the use of alternative materials in cementitious systems has attracted considerable interest due to their potential for augmenting the durability and performance of concrete. This research is investigating the use of three such materials as partial cement replacements in concrete: Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA), Limestone, and Metakaolin. RCA is a byproduct of the demolition of concrete structures that can be recycled as aggregate. Incorporating RCA into concrete reduces the environmental impact of waste disposal and reduces the carbon burden. Due to its pozzolanic properties, limestone, a sedimentary rock composed primarily of calcium carbonate, can be used as a substitute for cement. By substituting a portion of cement with limestone, the cement manufacturing process can substantially reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Metakaolin, a thermally treated form of kaolin clay, is yet another alternative material with pozzolanic properties. When used as a partial cement replacement, metakaolin increases the concrete’s strength, durability, and chemical resistance. It also contributes to lowering hydration heat and mitigating alkali-silica reactions, thereby enhancing the durability of concrete structures. In this investigation, cement is replaced by limestone powder which is varied from 0% to 50% and the addition of metakaolin of 20% in every mix design. RCA is also incorporated in the mix design as a replacement for coarse aggregate by 20%. In the experimental investigation, various tests were conducted on each mix slump test, density, compressive strength, sulphate attack, mass loss, x-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). After the investigation, the compressive strength improved by 15.07%, when metakaolin was added, and when LS was used to replace 10% of the cement, the compressive strength increased by 13.49%. The features of the combinations were negatively impacted when more cement was substituted. Following an investigation of hydration products, filler and dilution effects were found, both of which have the potential to be connected to improved mix quality. A mix that contains 20% metakaolin and 10% limestone powder may be considered the ideal mix owing to its superior strength and sulphate resistance when compared to normal concrete. It consists of less effect on slump value and density, the compressive strength was increased, and minimum mass loss after the sulphate attack. M3 mix best performer among all mix designs. It shows that the mix design with 20% metakaolin and 10% limestone powder is best-suitable for future recommendations.

show abstract

Section: Compressive Strength Apllied Load or Force Cross Sectional Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the properties of recycled aggregates concrete with lime and metakaolin

Verma,

Chouksey,

Meena

et al. 2023

Mater. Res. Express

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At elevated temperatures, the flexural strength was more vulnerable to the formation of microstructural defects, such as the propagation of fractures and the formation of porous structures. [77][78][79][80][81][82] Losses in compressive strength are varied from 31% to 85% in fibreless geopolymer specimens, but losses in polypropylene fibrous geopolymer specimens from 32% to 86%. This rate has risen considerably in comparison to samples lacking fibres.…”

Section: Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test (Upvt)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite

Verma,

Meena,

Singh

et al. 2023

Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is an eco-friendly, sustainable, cementless and green concrete. It could be an alternative to the conventional concrete. In alkaline circumstances, the alumina and silica concentration in geopolymer concrete creates the geopolymer bond, while regular concrete creates C-S-H (calcium silicate hydrate bond). The final result of the geopolymer bond does not include any water. At elevated temperatures, geopolymer concrete would thus be more stable. Due to its greater strength and durability quality, geopolymer concrete may be the ideal replacement for ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete. This research intends to examine how specimens of geopolymer concrete and regular concrete respond to exposure to increased temperatures between 100°C and 800°C. Mass loss, ultrasonic pulse velocity, compressive strength, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and derivative thermogravimetric analysis were all examined throughout the experimental examination. Both concrete specimens lose mass or weight as the exposure temperature rises; OPC concrete samples spalls at 600°C, while GPC sample fail at 800°C. GPC specimens lose around 12% of their original mass after being exposed to temperatures of 800°C, while OPC specimens lose about 7%. The GPC specimens maintained 60% of their initial compressive strength after being exposed to a temperature of 700°C, but the OPC concrete specimens only kept 52%. With each increase in exposure to extreme temperatures, the peaks of quartz and cristobalite are lowered. Only the form or structure of the mineral oxide would change; the chemical linkages would remain. The GPC samples subjected to temperatures of 100°C exhibit effective thermal stability than all other specimens exposed to extreme temperatures. As the exposure temperature rises, the GPC specimens become more thermally stable. According to the experimental findings, the GPC specimens’ bonding structure makes them more resistant to high temperatures than regular concrete specimens. Micropores are present in the voids of the geopolymer matrix, while mesopores and micropores are present in the voids of the OPC matrix. While OPC bonding is C-S-H formed by the hydration of lime and silica contained in the cement, the geopolymer bonding did not include the water content in the final or end result of geopolymerisation for strengthening.

show abstract

AI Driven Finite Element Analysis on Spur Gear Assembly to Enhance the Fatigue Life and Minimized the Contact Pressure*

Dwivedi,

Sharma,

Patil

et al. 2024

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete by Using Random Forest Algorithm

Cited by 8 publications

References 27 publications

Analysis of the properties of recycled aggregates concrete with lime and metakaolin

Analysis of the properties of recycled aggregates concrete with lime and metakaolin

Investigation on the impact of elevated temperature on sustainable geopolymer composite

AI Driven Finite Element Analysis on Spur Gear Assembly to Enhance the Fatigue Life and Minimized the Contact Pressure*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About