2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of concrete strengths enabled by missing data imputation and interpretable machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our method is a purely data-driven imputation model on the basis of optimization, it has good model interpretability, which is a noteworthy topic of imputation model recently (Lyngdoh et al, 2022). To better reveal the mechanism of truncation operation and the effects of model components, in this subsection we give further interpretations and discussions about the proposed method.…”
Section: Further Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our method is a purely data-driven imputation model on the basis of optimization, it has good model interpretability, which is a noteworthy topic of imputation model recently (Lyngdoh et al, 2022). To better reveal the mechanism of truncation operation and the effects of model components, in this subsection we give further interpretations and discussions about the proposed method.…”
Section: Further Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, in civil engineering, ML methods have improved the safety, productivity, quality, and maintenance of construction [17,18] and have been used to model and predict the mechanical properties of SCC [16,[19][20][21][22]. Therefore, the prediction of these properties through ML saves on the following: laboratory time, waste of concrete components, energy, and cost [3,14,16,20,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most widely used ML methods to predict these concrete properties are: decision tree regressor (DTR) [1,[25][26][27], random forest (RF) [24,25,28], eXtreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) [29,30], support vector regressor (SVR) [14,21,31], artificial neural network (ANN) [1,22,27,[32][33][34][35], and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) [25,29,30]. For example, Lyngdoh et al [19] employed K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), XG Boost, neural network (NN), least absolute shrinkage, random forest (RF), and selection operator (LASSO) to predict the splitting tensile strength and compressive strength of concrete. Meanwhile, Bui et al [36] established an expert system based on an artificial neural network (ANN) model and supported by a modified firefly algorithm (MFA) to predict the splitting tensile strength and compressive strength of high-performance concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the complex heterogeneous nature of concrete, phase separation remains a challenging task. The last advances in machine learning led to a better understanding of concrete properties, from strength 8 to shrinkage 9 or micromechanical properties, 10 and, more specifically, deep learning segmentation techniques have been fruitful in different fields 11 . For visual imagery, a convolutional neural network (CNN) might be used, combined with other techniques, to increase observation precision classifying or detecting objects of low contrast with a completely automated procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%