2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical intramuscular fat is a more precise predictor than marbling score, as the latter is a subjective trait and, additionally, there are triglycerides and phospholipids that are not visible to the human eye. For this reason there is a moderate correlation between marbling and intramuscular fat (Stewart et al, 2021), which has been confirmed in the present study (r 2 = 0.527).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Chemical intramuscular fat is a more precise predictor than marbling score, as the latter is a subjective trait and, additionally, there are triglycerides and phospholipids that are not visible to the human eye. For this reason there is a moderate correlation between marbling and intramuscular fat (Stewart et al, 2021), which has been confirmed in the present study (r 2 = 0.527).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Intramuscular fat (IMF), as an important component of beef marbling, directly determines the quality of beef [ 1 , 2 ]. It is closely related to the tenderness, flavour and juiciness of beef [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The candidate genes for IMF include ADRP [ 61 ] and CAST [ 62 ]. Stewart et al [ 63 ] used the relationship between marbling score and IMF to predict the palatability of beef to consumers, and IMF content and marbling were found to have remarkably similar precision. According to our previous calculation method, three SNPs in 12 hIMF were identified as significant loci ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%