Prediction of Cyclic Plastic Strain Energy Density and Fatigue Life of Non-Masing Behavior Materials Without Master Curve

Yadav, Sanjeev Singh; Roy, Samir Chandra; Veerababu, J.; Goyal, Sunil

doi:10.1007/s41403-021-00274-3

Cited by 3 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For Masing behavior,

W_{f} \approx 0

, whereas

W_{f} \neq 0

for non‐Masing behavior (irrespective of Type‐I and Type‐II). The details of the method can be found in the articles 11,12 . This method is the most versatile one as it can be used for both Masing and non‐Masing behavior (Type‐I and Type‐II).…”

Section: Assessment Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The value of

W_{italicnm ((), II)}

can be predicted for any strain amplitude for a material whose

S_{1}

S_{2}

S_{3}

S_{4}

K

and

n

are known. The values of these constants for 13 different materials can be found in our earlier publications 11,12 …”

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In summary, Equation 9 42 can be used for Masing behavior, Equation 10 6 can be used for non‐Masing of Type‐I, and Equation 12 12 can be used for non‐Masing of Type‐II for the estimation of CPSED. It should be noted that the authors 11,12 have demonstrated that Equation 12 12 can actually be used for Masing as well as non‐Masing behaviors of Type‐I and Type‐II. As the CPSED could be directly linked to the fatigue life, 6,11,144 a power law relationship 6 between the CPSED (

W

) and experimental fatigue life (

N_{f}

) was proposed for the prediction of fatigue life as given by Equation 13 6,12

W goodbreak= K_{1} {(N_{f})}^{n_{1}}

…”

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The complete details of the method and the material parameter identification can be found in the articles 11,12 . The authors 11,12 have implemented this method on 13 different materials for the prediction of CPSED and fatigue life.…”

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Representation of (A) Type‐I 11 and (B) Type‐II 11 non‐Masing behavior of LY225 steel and 304L SS, respectively. First published in Yadav et al 11 [Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering, 7, 411–416, 2022] by Springer Nature [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A comprehensive review and analysis of Masing/non‐Masing behavior of materials under fatigue

Yadav

Roy

Goyal³

2022

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last 50 years, many researchers have contributed significantly towards understanding the Masing/non-Masing behavior of materials. However, there has been no review article or scientific report published to date that highlights the progress made in this domain. This article presents a state-ofthe-art comprehensive review and analysis of the Masing/non-Masing behavior of materials under low cycle fatigue loading. Understanding of Masing/ non-Masing behavior is important for the development of fatigue-resistant materials, prediction of fatigue life, and constitutive modeling and simulation. The influence of various factors such as stacking fault energy, temperature, strain amplitude, and loading conditions on Masing/non-Masing behavior has been summarized in this article. The literature pertaining to the internal microstructural changes observed in different materials by various researchers has been collected and compiled. The different methods of analyzing Masing/ non-Masing behavior reported in the open literature are assessed and presented. The importance/significance of Masing/non-Masing behavior in constitutive modeling and fatigue life prediction has also been highlighted. Finally, conclusions based on the review and the potential problems required to be resolved in the future are also pointed out.

show abstract

“…For Masing behavior,

W_{f} \approx 0

, whereas

W_{f} \neq 0

Section: Assessment Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The value of

W_{italicnm ((), II)}

can be predicted for any strain amplitude for a material whose

S_{1}

S_{2}

S_{3}

S_{4}

K

and

n

are known. The values of these constants for 13 different materials can be found in our earlier publications 11,12 …”

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

W

) and experimental fatigue life (

N_{f}

) was proposed for the prediction of fatigue life as given by Equation 13 6,12

W goodbreak= K_{1} {(N_{f})}^{n_{1}}

…”

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fatigue Life Prediction Of Masing/non‐masing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A comprehensive review and analysis of Masing/non‐Masing behavior of materials under fatigue

Yadav

Roy

Goyal³

2022

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Type-I to Type-II non-Masing behavior of 304L SS under low cycle fatigue: Material’s internal changes

Yadav

Roy

Veerababu

et al. 2023

International Journal of Fatigue

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyclic stress response and microcrack initiation mechanism of modified 9Cr‐1Mo steel under low cycle fatigue at room temperature and 350°C

Shi

Cui

et al. 2023

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate the effect of temperature on microcracking mechanisms of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel, low cycle fatigue tests were performed at 350 C and room temperature (RT). At RT, the cyclic stress response at low strain amplitude (<0.5%) is controlled by friction stress while dominated by back stress at high strain amplitude. By comparison, the disappearance of sub-grain boundaries induced by dislocation annihilation occurs at 350 C, which contributes to the decrease in back stress, resulting in more significant effects of back stress compared to RT. As a result of the accumulated fatigue damage, the distance between two parallel extrusions at 350 C is larger than that at RT, which is ascribed to the disappearance of low angle sub-grain boundaries due to dislocation annihilation at 350 C. Due to the disappearance of small-angle grain boundaries at 350 C, microcracks initiate along high-angle grain boundaries at 350 C instead of along low-angle grain boundaries at RT.

show abstract

Prediction of Cyclic Plastic Strain Energy Density and Fatigue Life of Non-Masing Behavior Materials Without Master Curve

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

A comprehensive review and analysis of Masing/non‐Masing behavior of materials under fatigue

A comprehensive review and analysis of Masing/non‐Masing behavior of materials under fatigue

Type-I to Type-II non-Masing behavior of 304L SS under low cycle fatigue: Material’s internal changes

Cyclic stress response and microcrack initiation mechanism of modified 9Cr‐1Mo steel under low cycle fatigue at room temperature and 350°C

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About