2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of debonding strength of tensile steel/CFRP joints using fracture mechanics and stress based criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated by Bocciarelli et al [7], under externally applied tensile load, N, the shear stress, s a1 , close to the reinforcement end is given by…”
Section: Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As indicated by Bocciarelli et al [7], under externally applied tensile load, N, the shear stress, s a1 , close to the reinforcement end is given by…”
Section: Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interfacial failure includes the fracture induced by an interface crack (the problem of interfacial toughness) and the debonding of a perfect interface induced by interfacial stresses (the problem of interfacial strength) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. There are a huge amount of studies on interface crack [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the stress based criteria, the maximum principal stress is mainly used for very brittle materials [1,2] (since cracks initiate and propagate in a direction normal to these maximum principal stresses). Shear stress has also been extensively used to predict lap joint strength [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%