2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of effort and eye movement measures from driving scene components

Abstract: For transitions of control in automated vehicles, driver monitoring systems (DMS) may need to discern task difficulty and driver preparedness. Such DMS require models that relate driving scene components, driver effort, and eye measurements. Across two sessions, 15 participants enacted receiving control within 60 randomly ordered dashcam videos (3second duration) with variations in visible scene components: road curve angle, road surface area, road users, symbols, infrastructure, and vegetation/trees while the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that changes in TSIV have a significant effect on the change in drivers’ average saccade amplitude, with both too little and too much TSIV resulting in decreased average saccade amplitudes. This reflects the limited information that can be obtained with each fixation during the driver’s visual search under conditions of TSIV insufficient and overload, resulting in smaller subsequent saccade distances [ 39 ], as well as the greater difficulty for the driver to extract information, which makes the saccade amplitude smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that changes in TSIV have a significant effect on the change in drivers’ average saccade amplitude, with both too little and too much TSIV resulting in decreased average saccade amplitudes. This reflects the limited information that can be obtained with each fixation during the driver’s visual search under conditions of TSIV insufficient and overload, resulting in smaller subsequent saccade distances [ 39 ], as well as the greater difficulty for the driver to extract information, which makes the saccade amplitude smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of this, having a saccade amplitude that is sufficiently large is advantageous for the driver in their capacity to anticipate and access information concerning the traffic situation that is all around them. This, in turn, eliminates or significantly reduces the driver's experience of strain (69,70). Statistical characteristics and changing trends of drivers' saccade amplitude under different levels of TSIV are respectively shown in Table 8 and Figure 5.…”
Section: Analysis Of Saccade Amplitudementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sometimes for convenience, the size of AOIs can be simplified into a rectangle [113]. Second, the whole stimuli can be separated into several AOIs [20]. In addition, there are dynamic AOIs defined by stimuli that changes as time goes [20], [63].…”
Section: B Stimulus-generated Aoismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those focused on safety measure hazard detection [13], steering [14], automated driving [15], luminance [16] by drivers; and landing [17], conflict detection [18], air traffic control [19] by pilots. Mental tests address mental workload [20], [21], and fatigue [22], [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%