1996
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of electrodeposition rates from an impinging jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altering the angle of address also alters the hydrodynamic flow conditions and increases mass transport in the adjacent areas (Section 4.1.2). This is especially important in jet electrodeposition as it suppresses the diffusion layer, enabling greater limiting current densities and consequently, brighter finishes than achievable with a normal impinging jet [72].…”
Section: Nozzle Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altering the angle of address also alters the hydrodynamic flow conditions and increases mass transport in the adjacent areas (Section 4.1.2). This is especially important in jet electrodeposition as it suppresses the diffusion layer, enabling greater limiting current densities and consequently, brighter finishes than achievable with a normal impinging jet [72].…”
Section: Nozzle Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Walker [72] presented a comprehensive mathematical treatment of electrodeposition of gold from an impinging flat jet oriented at different angles with respect to the surface. The boundary of the electrolyte domain was calculated by employing an inviscid model for an impinging jet and viscous boundary layer theory was applied to calculate the shear stress and fluid velocity distribution in the vicinity of the cathode.…”
Section: Simulating Jet Electrodepositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, Cu films were selectively electrodeposited using electrochemical jet processing (EJP), under ambient conditions. 21 Relatively high electrolyte impingement velocities (up to 30 m/s) suppress the diffusion layer and increase the surface cation supply rate. This enables a greater limiting current condition in comparison to conventional bath deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively high electrolyte impingement velocities (up to 30 m/s) suppress the diffusion layer and increase the surface cation supply rate. This enables a greater limiting current condition in comparison to conventional bath deposition . An operational schematic is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 As long as the nozzle is placed close to the substrate, the electrodeposition is hydrodynamically limited to an area proportional to the width of the nozzle. 14 It is important to distinguish between submerged and unsubmerged jet systems. The main benefit of the unsubmerged system is to avoid the entrainment of the bulk fluid found in the submerged configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%