2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02747-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of evolutionary constraint by genomic annotations improves functional prioritization of genomic variants in maize

Abstract: Background Crop improvement through cross-population genomic prediction and genome editing requires identification of causal variants at high resolution, within fewer than hundreds of base pairs. Most genetic mapping studies have generally lacked such resolution. In contrast, evolutionary approaches can detect genetic effects at high resolution, but they are limited by shifting selection, missing data, and low depth of multiple-sequence alignments. Here we use genomic annotations to accurately … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each SNP, we calculated the log-likelihood difference between the reference and alternate alleles, where a more negative value indicates higher conservation. Deleterious mutations tend to have lower frequencies within a population due to selective constraints 32 , we therefore used minor allele frequency (MAF) to quantify the deleteriousness of mutations predicted by different methods. Despite the potential for low MAF in neutral/beneficial alleles, we believe this approach provides useful signals for assessing deleterious mutations 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each SNP, we calculated the log-likelihood difference between the reference and alternate alleles, where a more negative value indicates higher conservation. Deleterious mutations tend to have lower frequencies within a population due to selective constraints 32 , we therefore used minor allele frequency (MAF) to quantify the deleteriousness of mutations predicted by different methods. Despite the potential for low MAF in neutral/beneficial alleles, we believe this approach provides useful signals for assessing deleterious mutations 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleterious mutations are considered the genetic basis of heterosis, where hybrids yield more due to the suppression of deleterious recessives from one parent by dominant alleles from the other 36 . Traditionally, deleterious mutations have been identified by generating MSAs 32 , 37 , 38 and using evolutionary methods such as phyloP 24 and phastCons 24 . However, the prevalence of transposable elements and polyploidy in plant genomes complicates the MSA generation 39 , 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to cover the noncoding genome, we considered the presence in open chromatin, specifically MNase-hypersensitive regions obtained from shoot tissue were 32 . Second, for coding regions, we employed the PICNC (Prediction of mutation Impact by Calibrated Nucleotide Conservation) 63 . A higher PICNC score indicates a stronger degree of evolutionary constraint, and these metrics of the maize genome are available from Data Commons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in humans, evolutionary conserved sequences are enriched for trait and disease heritability [48, 49], and conservation across related species can be used to prioritize medically relevant variants in fine mapping [50, 51] and rare-variant association studies [52, 53]. Similarly, multi-species alignments are being used by conservation geneticists to estimate the fitness effects of mutations in wild populations [54, 55] and by plant breeders to aid in genomic selection [56, 57]. And there is growing interest in using estimated ancestral recombination graphs (ARGs) to perform explicitly tree-based versions of QTL mapping and complex trait analysis [58, 59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%