2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2946980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Extubation Failure for Intensive Care Unit Patients Using Light Gradient Boosting Machine

Abstract: Extubation failure is a complex and ongoing problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). It refers to the patients who require re-intubation after extubation (namely disconnection from mechanical ventilation). In these patients, extubation failure leads to severe risks associated with re-intubation and is associated with increased mortalities, longer stay in ICU and also higher health care costs. Many studies have been proposed to analyze the problem of extubation failure and identify possible factors or indices … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
52
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, LightGBM had the highest AUC value among the three models. This is consistent with the study by Chen et al, which showed that, compared with XGBoost, artificial neural network, and support vector machine, LightGBM was the most effective model to predict extubation 22 . In the evaluation metrics, high precision decreases reintubation, and high recall decreases unnecessary ventilator use and tracheostomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, LightGBM had the highest AUC value among the three models. This is consistent with the study by Chen et al, which showed that, compared with XGBoost, artificial neural network, and support vector machine, LightGBM was the most effective model to predict extubation 22 . In the evaluation metrics, high precision decreases reintubation, and high recall decreases unnecessary ventilator use and tracheostomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Machine learning has the potential to improve the prediction of successful extubation. Although there are numerous studies on mechanical ventilation, only a few studies use machine learning to predict the success of weaning from ventilatory support [22][23][24] . Thus, this study aimed to investigate the performance and accuracy of machine learning to predict the success of extubation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, F1 score and error rate metrics of the proposed strategy were assessed using the following formulas, where TP stands for the number of true positives, TN stands for the number of true negatives and FP and FN denote the numbers of first and second error types (false positives and false negatives, respectively) ( Chen et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Experimental Verification and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, discussions of existing techniques are presented, which are used to predict the health status of patients using machine learning techniques. In addition, the advantages and limitations of the existing methods were also discussed in [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T. Chen, J. Xu, H. Ying, X. Chen, R. Feng, X. Fang, and J. Wu, [17] predicted the Extubation Failure (EF) by analyzing 3636 adult patient records in MIMIC-III clinical database using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). According to the results of LightGBM, afeature importance analysis were carried out by interpreting these features using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%