1995
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540290086022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Functional Outcome and Tissue Loss in Acute Cortical Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several small series demonstrated no significant statistical correlation between CT lesion volume and clinical measures (BI, NIHSS, Rankin Disability Scale). 9,17,18 Other, generally larger, series did show correlations between subacute CT lesion size and clinical scales (NIHSS, Rankin Disability Scale, Oxford Disability Scale, aphasia severity scale). 7,19 -21 Compared with these earlier investigations, the RANTTAS data set is unique in size, geographic diversity, and actual participation in an acute stroke clinical trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several small series demonstrated no significant statistical correlation between CT lesion volume and clinical measures (BI, NIHSS, Rankin Disability Scale). 9,17,18 Other, generally larger, series did show correlations between subacute CT lesion size and clinical scales (NIHSS, Rankin Disability Scale, Oxford Disability Scale, aphasia severity scale). 7,19 -21 Compared with these earlier investigations, the RANTTAS data set is unique in size, geographic diversity, and actual participation in an acute stroke clinical trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Decrease in infarct volume has been suggested as an appropriate surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure for human stroke trials. 8,9 However, few reports have analyzed correlations between infarct volume and clinical end points in stroke trial populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 78 references [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100]described 68 different studies and 83 separate prognostic models. We classified the models on the basis of whether they were community or hospital-based, the pathological type of stroke included, and the type and timing of the outcome (table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined the relationship between stroke size and clinical outcome. Studies using computed tomography to measure lesion size [5][6][7][8] have shown conflicting results. The largest such study 8 found only a modest correlation (r 2 ϭ0.3) between subacute infarct volume and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 3 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%