2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-021-02752-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Ground Motion Intensity Measures Using an Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14] different supervised learning algorithms applied to Ecuador, Haiti, Nepal, and South Korean earthquakes data to classify damage grades to buildings. A ground motion prediction by ANN of MLP-architecture is considered in [15], performing training, validating, and testing on the Indian strong motion database including 659 records from 138 earthquakes. Paper [16] considers the landslide displacement prediction by GNSS time series analysis carried out with LSTM network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] different supervised learning algorithms applied to Ecuador, Haiti, Nepal, and South Korean earthquakes data to classify damage grades to buildings. A ground motion prediction by ANN of MLP-architecture is considered in [15], performing training, validating, and testing on the Indian strong motion database including 659 records from 138 earthquakes. Paper [16] considers the landslide displacement prediction by GNSS time series analysis carried out with LSTM network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after incorporating more ground motion data, restrictions of the originally adopted linear regression models may limit their capabilities in extracting complex nonlinear behaviors in the data. Thus, the use of machine learning as a statistical method is beneficial for constructing complex relationships between model parameters and site/earthquake characteristics 84,90–92 . Besides, the deep learning‐based ground motion models also show a more powerful predictive capacity, 93 especially for big data without the assumption of predefined functional forms.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the use of machine learning as a statistical method is beneficial for constructing complex relationships between model parameters and site/earthquake characteristics. 84,[90][91][92] Besides, the deep learning-based ground motion models also show a more powerful predictive capacity, 93 especially for big data without the assumption of predefined functional forms. These data-driven methods can extract critical information from massive earthquake records and find high-dimensional features to achieve better results.…”
Section: Further Improvement In the Usable Scope Of Sgmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ANN technique,Sreejaya et al (2021) [33] generated a prediction framework for ground-movement intensity measures for active shallow crustal earthquakes in India. The model was composed of 659 ground motion records gathered from 138 earthquakes recorded by different seismic networks with the aim of seismic hazard analysis.Pandit et al (2021) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the values in the graph are not scaled. Figure[33] shows the error function profile (predicted value -actual value) of the ANN-2 model. We can see that there is a uniform distribution with a precision of 0.01, indicating that the model's predictions are accurate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%