2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03044-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of histologic grade and type of small (< 4 cm) papillary renal cell carcinomas using texture and neural network analysis: a feasibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were mainly based on SRM for benignmalignant discrimination and extracted features based only on the largest dimension of the tumor and did not include the full 3D-ROI, thus not containing the complete information of the tumor. Hagi-Momenian et al [22] constructed various machine learning models based on noncontrast phase, CMP and NP for histological grading and tumor subtyping of small pRCC, respectively. The models constructed based on the features extracted from CMP had the highest AUC values of 0.97-1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were mainly based on SRM for benignmalignant discrimination and extracted features based only on the largest dimension of the tumor and did not include the full 3D-ROI, thus not containing the complete information of the tumor. Hagi-Momenian et al [22] constructed various machine learning models based on noncontrast phase, CMP and NP for histological grading and tumor subtyping of small pRCC, respectively. The models constructed based on the features extracted from CMP had the highest AUC values of 0.97-1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics is a new research method that extracts features from medical images that are not visible to the human eye [18,19]. Radiomics has been successfully in various areas related to SRM, including differentiating between benign and malignant SRM and grading small RCC [20][21][22][23][24]. Most research has focused on textural features, and has not considered the potential value of clinical data and imaging characteristics, which could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were mainly based on SRM for benign-malignant discrimination and extracted features based only on the largest dimension of the tumor and did not include the full 3D-ROI, thus not containing the complete information of the tumor. Hagi-Momenian et al [ 24 ] constructed various machine learning models based on noncontrast phase, CMP and NP for histological grading and tumor subtyping of small pRCC, respectively. The models constructed based on the features extracted from CMP had the highest AUC values of 0.97-1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the ensemble deep learning model showed good performance for discriminating Xp11.2 tRCC from common RCC subtypes with a test AUC of 0.845, and it also achieved similar or better diagnostic performance than urologists. Additionally, the previous study has shown that deep learning models trained by CT images can accurately distinguish between high and low nuclear grades for ccRCC with the accuracy of 0.82 [24], but more studies displayed that ML models constructed from CT imaging texture features can accurately predict the nuclear grades for ccRCC or pRCC with good performance [25][26][27][28]. We speculated that ML has much better performance than DL for nuclear-grade prediction, but ML based on artificial neural networks showed the greatest accuracy for differentiating low-and high-grade for ccRCCs [29].…”
Section: Performance Compared Between the Ensemble Model And Urologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%