2022
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.995279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of in vivo hip contact forces during common activities of daily living using a segment-based musculoskeletal model

Abstract: Background: Quantifying in vivo hip muscle and contact forces during activities of daily living (ADL) provides valuable information for diagnosis and treatment of hip-related disorders. The objective of this study was to utilize Freebody, a segment-based musculoskeletal model, for the prediction of hip contact forces using a novel objective function during seven common ADLs and validate its performance against the publicly available HIP98 dataset.Methods: Marker data, ground reaction forces, and hip contact fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverse MSK modeling uses the observed kinematics and ground reaction forces to determine the net forces and moments at the joints and uses an optimization method to resolve the muscle force sharing. FreeBody is a segment-based MSK model ( Cleather and Bull, 2015 ) that has been extensively validated for muscle activations using EMG experimental data for bilateral transfemoral amputees ( Toderita et al, 2021 ), unilateral transtibial amputees ( Ding et al, 2023 ), knee joint contact forces for osteoarthritis patients ( Ding et al, 2016 ), and hip joint contact forces also using instrumented implants ( Amiri and Bull, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse MSK modeling uses the observed kinematics and ground reaction forces to determine the net forces and moments at the joints and uses an optimization method to resolve the muscle force sharing. FreeBody is a segment-based MSK model ( Cleather and Bull, 2015 ) that has been extensively validated for muscle activations using EMG experimental data for bilateral transfemoral amputees ( Toderita et al, 2021 ), unilateral transtibial amputees ( Ding et al, 2023 ), knee joint contact forces for osteoarthritis patients ( Ding et al, 2016 ), and hip joint contact forces also using instrumented implants ( Amiri and Bull, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cautioned by Curry et al [46], validation still represents a key limitation of many of the models that have been constructed. The advent of publicly available data sets, including direct measurements of joint contact force during walking (for example, [47,48]), has resulted in substantial improvement in the sophistication of modeling techniques [49], with the construction of patient-specific models, in particular, demonstrating encouraging accuracy for the estimation of the hip or tibiofemoral joint contact forces [50][51][52]. However, the extensive personalization of model parameters remains a time-consuming procedure and typically requires detailed medical imaging data that are not routinely available [53].…”
Section: Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musculoskeletal modeling can quantify articular contact forces within the tibiofemoral joint as well as muscle activation strategies by using inverse dynamics calculations and muscle optimization methods [ 17 ]. These have been validated for tibiofemoral contact forces using instrumented knee prostheses [ 25 ], hip contact forces [ 1 ], and for muscle activation using electromyography [ 16 , 44 ]. Therefore, it is appropriate to use musculoskeletal modeling to assess compartmental loading of the tibiofemoral joint in stair ambulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%