2021
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2021.1947540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of InSAR deformation time-series using a long short-term memory neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while the ideal approach to assessing reliability involves comparing the studied methods with physical numerical models and empirical models, the accuracy of existing geological and hydrological data is often insu cient, lacks detail, or is con dential. Consequently, precise numerical or empirical modeling of ground subsidence remains challenging (Chen et al 2021). By utilizing singlevariable predictions for surface subsidence, we circumvent the limitations posed by inadequately informative data sources, achieving higher prediction accuracy even when subsidence-driving factor data is scarce.…”
Section: Comparison Of Machine Learning Methods For Urban Ground Subs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while the ideal approach to assessing reliability involves comparing the studied methods with physical numerical models and empirical models, the accuracy of existing geological and hydrological data is often insu cient, lacks detail, or is con dential. Consequently, precise numerical or empirical modeling of ground subsidence remains challenging (Chen et al 2021). By utilizing singlevariable predictions for surface subsidence, we circumvent the limitations posed by inadequately informative data sources, achieving higher prediction accuracy even when subsidence-driving factor data is scarce.…”
Section: Comparison Of Machine Learning Methods For Urban Ground Subs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the method based on mathematical statistics, the method based on deep learning can better learn the nonlinearity and randomness in data. Among the land subsidence prediction models based on deep learning, the models based on LSTM and its variants are most widely used (Chen et al, 2021, Kumar et al, 2021, Liu et al, 2021. In (Liu et al, 2021), considering the spatial heterogeneity of land subsidence, the authors first cluster the land subsidence data and then train the prediction model based on LSTM for each subclass.…”
Section: Land Subsidence Displacement Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the implementation is relatively simple, the prediction accuracy is not high due to the single data and easy overfitting of the model. The method based on deep learning is mainly based on LSTM network (Chen et al, 2021, Kumar et al, 2021, Liu et al, 2021. Compared with previous methods, these methods improve the prediction accuracy to a certain extent by better simulating the nonlinear effects between land subsidence displacement and various influencing factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nukala et al [ 42 ] proposed a new method based on recurrent neural networks (RNN), applying Sentinel-1 to predict time-series deformation maps and achieved good prediction performance. LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) networks address the limitations of gradient explosion and disappearance that older RNN variants may suffer when learning long-term dependencies of data, improving time-series InSAR deformation prediction models [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Wang et al proposed an innovative InSAR deformation prediction integrated algorithm based on transformer models to accurately predict time-series deformation surrounding Salt Lake [ 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%