2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of interfacial tensile bond strength in 3D printed concrete based on a closed-form fracture model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buildings 2023, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 13 times more than the expected relationship for conventional concrete (12%) [1]. The difference was caused by higher cement content, smaller aggregate size [33], and the use of PP fibres, possibly also due to the orientation of the fibres [21].…”
Section: Splitting Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Buildings 2023, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 13 times more than the expected relationship for conventional concrete (12%) [1]. The difference was caused by higher cement content, smaller aggregate size [33], and the use of PP fibres, possibly also due to the orientation of the fibres [21].…”
Section: Splitting Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In previous studies, it has been reported that interfacial adhesion strength affects the anisotropy of printed objects [8,13]. The 3D-printed objects show higher strength in the extrusion direction than in the perpendicular direction [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It triggers two main challenges for printed objects. One of the challenges is weak interfacial adhesion strength between layers [8][9][10][11]. The other is the anisotropic mechanical property of the 3D-printed object [8,9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%