2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Intra-Species Protein-Protein Interactions in Enteropathogens Facilitating Systems Biology Study

Abstract: Protein-protein interactions in Escherichia coli (E. coli) has been studied extensively using high throughput methods such as tandem affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry and yeast two-hybrid method. This can in turn be used to understand the mechanisms of bacterial cellular processes. However, experimental characterization of such huge amount of interactions data is not available for other important enteropathogens. Here, we propose a support vector machine (SVM)-based prediction model using the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniformly choosing random protein pairs excluding experimental interactions produces an unbiased estimate of the distribution of negatives in the prediction of protein-protein interactions [ 38 ]. Hence, this procedure is a common practice to generate negative datasets containing at most a negligible fraction of interacting proteins [ 39 41 ]. FiberDock calculates several binding energy scores, including attractive and repulsive van de Waals forces, the atomic contact energy, partial electrostatics, hydrogen and disulfide bonds, π-stacking, and aliphatic interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniformly choosing random protein pairs excluding experimental interactions produces an unbiased estimate of the distribution of negatives in the prediction of protein-protein interactions [ 38 ]. Hence, this procedure is a common practice to generate negative datasets containing at most a negligible fraction of interacting proteins [ 39 41 ]. FiberDock calculates several binding energy scores, including attractive and repulsive van de Waals forces, the atomic contact energy, partial electrostatics, hydrogen and disulfide bonds, π-stacking, and aliphatic interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46] also showed weaker results for E. coli compared to other non-bacterial species. More work in improving SVM classification using bacterial PPIs was also conducted in 2015 24 [70], [71]. More recently, state-of-the-art DNNs have been used for PPI predictions and tested on E. coli data presenting high accuracy (>96%) results [72]- [74].…”
Section: Sequence-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%