2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
194
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
194
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In a landslide susceptibility prediction in W Belgium, Van den Eeckhaut et al (2006) used recently a "rare event logistic regression" model to circumvent the problem of small datasets. Although they also concluded that this multivariate model is a useful tool to These cumulative plots indicate how many "most hazardous" percents of the study area have to be taken into account to predict a given percentage of the future landslides according to each model and the adopted cross-validation process.…”
Section: Sample Size and Prediction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a landslide susceptibility prediction in W Belgium, Van den Eeckhaut et al (2006) used recently a "rare event logistic regression" model to circumvent the problem of small datasets. Although they also concluded that this multivariate model is a useful tool to These cumulative plots indicate how many "most hazardous" percents of the study area have to be taken into account to predict a given percentage of the future landslides according to each model and the adopted cross-validation process.…”
Section: Sample Size and Prediction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). The logistic model in Van den Eeckhaut et al (2006) and the estimator used in Eq. (3) here are two different estimation procedures based on two different assumptions (Chung, 2006).…”
Section: Sample Size and Prediction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method adopted in the literature to divide the susceptibility histogram into different categories is in many cases based on expert criteria (Dai and Lee, 2002;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Van Den Eeckhaut et al, 2006) and does not take into account the real underlying data. It is necessary to explore data and obtain knowledge of their statistical distribution before applying any method of classification (Foote and Crum, 2014).…”
Section: Data Source and Landslide Susceptibility Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is now widely used in literature (Guzzetti et al 2006; Van den Eeckhaut, 2006;Thiery et al, 2007 andSterlacchini et al, 2008) for the comparison of susceptibility models. In Table 3a most kappa (K) values below 0.4 suggest that the LSMs are not as similar as revealed by Spearman's coefficients, with some exceptions.…”
Section: Unweighted and Linear Weighted Kappa Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%