2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2874-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis from lower rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and risk factors for metastasis: Multicenter study of the Lymph Node Committee of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

Abstract: A logistic model including risk factors for LPLN metastasis and MRI findings had significantly better performance for prediction of LPLN metastasis compared with a model based on MRI findings alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cut-off value of size-based diagnosis for rectal cancer is inconsistent; for example, Akiyoshi et al (5) reported that 8 mm is the optimum cut-off for prediction of LPLN metastasis on MRI, whereas Ogawa et al (6) proposed a cut-off of 5 mm. Therefore, the accuracy of size-based diagnosis is uncertain and other methods to predict metastasis have been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cut-off value of size-based diagnosis for rectal cancer is inconsistent; for example, Akiyoshi et al (5) reported that 8 mm is the optimum cut-off for prediction of LPLN metastasis on MRI, whereas Ogawa et al (6) proposed a cut-off of 5 mm. Therefore, the accuracy of size-based diagnosis is uncertain and other methods to predict metastasis have been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate introduction of preoperative treatment requires accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis prior to surgery. At present, size-based diagnosis using the maximum short axis diameter of LNs on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is predominantly used to predict metastasis (5,6). However, diagnostic accuracy of size-based diagnosis is unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For nodes in the lateral pelvis, mostly size criteria have been tested, with variable cutoffs and variable outcomes [52][53][54][55][56]. According to research by the Lateral Node Study Consortium, in the particular case of cT3/4 low tumours, lateral lymph nodes with a short axis of at least 7 mm on staging MR have a significantly higher risk of lateral recurrence and lateral lymph node dissection in such cases may reduce lateral recurrences significantly [57].…”
Section: Lymph Node Involvement and Tumour Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metastatic lymph nodes showed uneven texture and invisible lymphatic hilum structure under ultrasound. PET -CT for rectal cancer currently also has reference value for the existence of lymph node metastasis, tumor metastasis of lymph nodes will appear in the accumulation of radioactive solid glucose, similar with the DWI (diffusion weighted imaging) can iliac blood vessels weeks about the existence of rectal cancer lymph node metastasis is helpful, but recently some scholars metastatic lymph nodes of PET judgment, sensitivity analysis, only 62% [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Recently, by combining artificial intelligence with tumor imaging and comparing big data of lymph node metastasis with tumor imaging of patients, the probability of judging lymph node metastasis is estimated to be 77.8% [31,13,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: How To Accurately Evaluate Lymph Nodes By Rectal Magnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%