2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of limiting activity coefficients for binary vapor-liquid equilibrium using neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques such as gas–liquid chromatography, , high-performance liquid chromatography, and differential ebulliometry ,, are traditionally used to measure activities in extremely dilute systems at varying concentrations, leading to the IDAC by extrapolation . There has been considerable interest in predicting these coefficients ,, due to their use in phase equilibria studies in chemical engineering applications. ,,, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as gas–liquid chromatography, , high-performance liquid chromatography, and differential ebulliometry ,, are traditionally used to measure activities in extremely dilute systems at varying concentrations, leading to the IDAC by extrapolation . There has been considerable interest in predicting these coefficients ,, due to their use in phase equilibria studies in chemical engineering applications. ,,, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,005 available data points, including 235 solutes, 352 solvents, and 6680 solute/solvent combinations at temperatures ranging from 253.15 to 555.6 K, are obtained. 6441 γ ∞ for 132 compounds are collected from the literature used for revising MOSCED parameters 16 Over 1800 γ ∞ in temperature range of 249.84–412.60 K are gathered from the literature utilized for developing an artificial neural network model 24 411 γ ∞ at 298.15 K for 168 components are collected from DECHEMA for developing a neural network‐based QSPR model 25 …”
Section: Dataset Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not until this century that machine learning was employed in the prediction of γ ∞ . Behrooz and Boozarjomehry gathered more than 1800 γ ∞ at different temperatures from open literature and used them to develop an artificial neural network‐based method for γ ∞ prediction 24 . Molecular weight, dipole moment, critical temperature, critical pressure, critical volume, and acentric factor for both solutes and solvents, along with the system temperature, were selected as model inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the opposite side of the methods spectrum are machine learning (ML) methods that have also been used to predict activity coefficients, solvation free energies, or other fluid properties for large data sets, while being difficult to interpret in physical terms. To make use of the advantages of both, physically based and ML approaches, a combination has been suggested that is based on fingerprints generated from short equilibrium MD simulations that encompass information on the distributions of potential energy of the solute (and its LJ and electrostatic components), radius of gyration, and solvent-accessible surface area . This approach was used successfully to predict solvation free energies in five different solvents as well as partition coefficients in three solvent combinations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%