2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12073631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Linear Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides Active against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria Based on Machine Learning Models

Abstract: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered as promising alternatives to conventional antibiotics in order to overcome the growing problems of antibiotic resistance. Computational prediction approaches receive an increasing interest to identify and design the best candidate AMPs prior to the in vitro tests. In this study, we focused on the linear cationic peptides with non-hemolytic activity, which are downloaded from the Database of Antimicrobial Activity and Structure of Peptides (DBAASP). Referring to the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major drawback in previous machine-learning predictions of antimicrobial peptide activity is that those models are not bacteria specific. A recent study tried to circumvent this problem by predicting the antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and utilized data sets for peptide activity against three Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and A. baumannii , and P. aeruginosa . Although these species share some common membrane architecture, there are key differences between them that might affect antimicrobial activity against them .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major drawback in previous machine-learning predictions of antimicrobial peptide activity is that those models are not bacteria specific. A recent study tried to circumvent this problem by predicting the antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and utilized data sets for peptide activity against three Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and A. baumannii , and P. aeruginosa . Although these species share some common membrane architecture, there are key differences between them that might affect antimicrobial activity against them .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1. The largest number of AMP neighbors were for the antibiotics rifampicin (17), erythromycin (12), and kanamycin (8), and these antibiotics also had the largest number of common neighbors: 4 for rifampicin and kanamycin, 4 for rifampicin and erythromycin, and 5 for erythromycin and kanamycin. Thus, it is not surprising that by preferential attachment (see Fig.…”
Section: Predicting Possible Synergistic and Non-synergistic Amp-anti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data are even sparser for AMP-AMP combinations, which may contribute to the lack of studies on elucidating molecular mechanisms of antibacterial action for existing AMP-AMP combinations and predicting activity of new ones [16]. Previous studies focused on the efficacy of single AMP types alone and were limited in combining very different bacteria for their analyses (e.g., broad categories of gram-positive vs gram-negative or active against one type vs inactive against all tested types [17,18]). Although certain AMP types and AMP combinations have shown broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, there are key differences between bacteria, for example in membrane composition [19] or morphology [20], that can affect the efficacy of a single AMP type or AMPs in combination and render some bacteria but not others resistant to November 17, 2022 2/21 the antimicrobial agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Tiihonen et al [34] studied the antimicrobial activity of conjugated oligoelectrolyte molecules against Escherichia coli. Söylemez et al [35] also utilized a ML for prediction of antimicrobial activity of peptides against gram negative and positive bacteria. Her and Wu [36] explored using a pan-genome-based ML method for prediction of the antimicrobial resistance activities of E. coli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%