2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of lysine glutarylation sites by maximum relevance minimum redundancy feature selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model, the independent test dataset was used to compare the model with existing prediction tool. Considering previously published prediction tools, only one predictor of glutarylation sites, GlutPred [55], was freely available. We compared our predictive performance to that of GlutPred based on independent testing datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model, the independent test dataset was used to compare the model with existing prediction tool. Considering previously published prediction tools, only one predictor of glutarylation sites, GlutPred [55], was freely available. We compared our predictive performance to that of GlutPred based on independent testing datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, we have identified three Glutarylation site predictors with the most promising results. In 2018, GlutPred [22] was developed using multiple feature extraction techniques along with maximum relevance and minimum redundancy feature selections to predict the Glutarylation sites. In the same year, iGlu-Lys [23] was developed using the finest features to predict the Glutarylation sites from the four-encodings method.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past few years, a wide range of methods has been proposed to predict Glutarylation sites using many machine learning approaches [20][21][22][23][24][25]. Recently, many deep learning models have been used to predict different types of PTMs [6,[26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method of mRMR uses the correlation between the information as an evaluation index, which can then find the optimal characteristic subset. 15 Assuming that an m-dimensional fault sample space with c fault characteristics and n fault samples, the mRMR can select an optimal subsample space S with p-dimension ðp mÞ from the original sample space. In the subsample space S, the redundancy of repeated information between each fault feature is the smallest, and the correlation between the features and the faults is the largest.…”
Section: Feature Selection Based On Mrmrmentioning
confidence: 99%