2018
DOI: 10.1520/jte20160183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Mechanical Performance of Cemented Paste Backfill by the Electrical Resistivity Measurement

Abstract: Cemented Paste Backfill (CPB) has become a useful practice in many modern operations around the world. This method is an innovative tailings disposal and underground mine backfilling scheme that returns much of this material to the underground stope field. Thus, it is of great interest for financial and security reasons to fully comprehend the mechanical performance of such underground CPB. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is one of the most commonly used parameters for evaluating the mechanical performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xu Wenbin et al proposed a non-destructive testing method to determine the mechanical properties of CPB using electrical resistivity (ER). Based on the logarithmic relationship with ER obtained at 90 days, the strength of CPB was developed to be evaluated using the resistivity testing method [26,27]. However, fewer studies have been conducted to characterize the viscoelasticity and plasticity of gangue fly ash slurries using resistivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu Wenbin et al proposed a non-destructive testing method to determine the mechanical properties of CPB using electrical resistivity (ER). Based on the logarithmic relationship with ER obtained at 90 days, the strength of CPB was developed to be evaluated using the resistivity testing method [26,27]. However, fewer studies have been conducted to characterize the viscoelasticity and plasticity of gangue fly ash slurries using resistivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UCS test is widely used to evaluate CPB in laboratories. It is destructive, and significant time is required to prepare samples for testing [41,42], whereas UPV is a rapid, non-destructive means of estimating UCS with a portable and inexpensive system [43][44][45]. The UPV is strongly correlated (r = 0.79) with the UCS of CPB [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e internal pore of CPB mainly depended on the filling technology in the engineering site and the contacting difficulty between the CPB and goaf roof [2]. e above studies mainly discussed the effect of the curing temperature, curing time, and types and contents of cementing material on the mechanical properties of CPB, and most of those involved the aggregate particles with a kind of particle size distribution [29,30]. Under severe conditions, the grading aggregate particles of CPB can improve the filling effect and reduce the filling cost [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%