2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114515000896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of metabolisable energy concentrations of fresh-cut grass using digestibility data measured with non-pregnant non-lactating cows

Abstract: Pasture-based ruminant production systems are common in certain areas of the world, but energy evaluation in grazing cattle is performed with equations developed, in their majority, with sheep or cattle fed total mixed rations. The aim of the current study was to develop predictions of metabolisable energy (ME) concentrations in fresh-cut grass offered to non-pregnant non-lactating cows at maintenance energy level, which may be more suitable for grazing cattle. Data were collected from three digestibility tria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between treatments, genotypes, and interactions were assessed and declared as nonsignificant at P > 0.05 and significant at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001. A REML analysis was also performed to develop a range of linear and multiple relationships to estimate MUN and urine N outputs using the method previously described by Stergiadis et al (2015). In brief, linear regression relationships were developed where the responses were MUN output, MUN concentration, and urine N output, and the explanatory variables were N intake, dietary CP content, and MUN output, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between treatments, genotypes, and interactions were assessed and declared as nonsignificant at P > 0.05 and significant at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001. A REML analysis was also performed to develop a range of linear and multiple relationships to estimate MUN and urine N outputs using the method previously described by Stergiadis et al (2015). In brief, linear regression relationships were developed where the responses were MUN output, MUN concentration, and urine N output, and the explanatory variables were N intake, dietary CP content, and MUN output, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations for the prediction of FNO including DMI either as sole predictor or in combination with CP, ME and TF, showed similar accuracy among the databases, confirming that DMI is a reliable sole predictor for FNO in low CP diets (Stergiadis et al, 2015a;Angelidis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Equations Performance On the Low Range Of Diet Cp Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…research environment). The method used in the present study to develop the prediction equations has been previously used in several studies (Stergiadis et al, 2015a;Stergiadis et al, 2015b;Stergiadis et al, 2016). In brief, the optimum random model developed for each response variable was built by fitting the same fixed effect model and the prospective models of the random variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model, these estimates were not affected by changes in N fertiliser application rates even though there is a strong correlation with N fertiliser rate and the N content of grass (Gately et al, 1972). Grass N content was calculated using equations developed by Stergiadis et al (2015) where metabolisable energy ME content of grass was used as the main predictor. Grass DMD was the main predictor for grass ME content which decreased from 820 g kg DM -1 in February to 730 g kg DM -1 in November.…”
Section: Feedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for grass-based systems, grazed and conserved grass consist of up to 90% of a finishing animal's diet (Crosson et al, 2014). This is a challenge as the composition and quality of grass varies over the grazing season and with different management practices (Keady et al, 2000;Stergiadis et al, 2015), making it difficult to manipulate the diet to reduce N excreted. Therefore as silage quality is largely dictated by management, the efficacy of manipulating silage quality to reduce N excretion in grass-based production systems has been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%