2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8339(01)00017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of most probable extreme values for jackup dynamic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches to answer these two challenges include the use of efficient numerical methods and model test [1,5], reduction in simulation efforts by selecting the critical sea states [41], use of environmental contour and inverse first order reliability method (IFORM) [49,28], and use of bootstrap methods in deriving the confidence interval from the structural analysis [15]. These studies also assessed various types of structures with regards to long term performance, such as jacket structures [18], jackup rigs [39] as well as floating structures [56]. It was recognized that the long term assessment remains one of the most difficult tasks, and the statistical modeling of the ocean http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.029 0045-7949/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to answer these two challenges include the use of efficient numerical methods and model test [1,5], reduction in simulation efforts by selecting the critical sea states [41], use of environmental contour and inverse first order reliability method (IFORM) [49,28], and use of bootstrap methods in deriving the confidence interval from the structural analysis [15]. These studies also assessed various types of structures with regards to long term performance, such as jacket structures [18], jackup rigs [39] as well as floating structures [56]. It was recognized that the long term assessment remains one of the most difficult tasks, and the statistical modeling of the ocean http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.029 0045-7949/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartnett (2000) outlined the application and validation of a frequency-domain response model, which was validated in a number of different ways. Lu et al (2002) compared four major dynamic time-domain methods recommended in SNAME T&R Bulletin 5-5A (1994), including Drag/inertia parameter method, Weibull fitting method, Gumbel fitting method and Winterstein/Jensen method. In their studies, the leg-to-hull flexibility, P-delta effect and foundation fixity are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%