2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of oral appliance treatment outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend was stronger towards treatment effect when patients with normal baseline ambulatory blood pressure were excluded. As per the systemic review by Okuno et al [173] although oral appliances have demonstrated good efficacy in patients with mild to severe levels of OSA, they are not completely effective in all patients. Studies vary in the degree of bias and the definitions applied for treatment success.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend was stronger towards treatment effect when patients with normal baseline ambulatory blood pressure were excluded. As per the systemic review by Okuno et al [173] although oral appliances have demonstrated good efficacy in patients with mild to severe levels of OSA, they are not completely effective in all patients. Studies vary in the degree of bias and the definitions applied for treatment success.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Nonetheless, the accuracy of these tools to predict OSA response to MAS treatment varies greatly (see Fig. 2), 113 and most are inadequate to be considered for clinical practice due to high cost and/or complexity. Comprehensive phenotyping of OSA patients has the potential to identify characteristics that can predict-individually or in combination-OSA response to MAS treatment.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a Mandibular Repositioning Appliance (MRA) is indicated in patients with a primary snore, mild OSAS or who are CPAP intolerant. 7 Despite the low MRA rate of success of 48%, 8 important health outcomes were similar after 1 month of optimal MRA and CPAP treatment in patients with moderate severe OSAS. The results may be explained by the greater efficacy of CPAP being offset by inferior compliance relative to MRA, resulting in similar effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In spite of obtaining good results, studies that evaluate the remotely controlled mandibular positioner and drug-induced sleep endoscopy are very difficult to execute. 8 To predict the success of the MRA, it is fundamental that Polysomnography (PSG) be used with accurate criteria sucess. The predictor must be simple, not invasive and easily accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%