2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-008-0940-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study

Abstract: Aims/hypothesisOutcome data on individuals with diabetic foot ulcers are scarce, especially in those with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We therefore examined the clinical characteristics that best predict poor outcome in a large population of diabetic foot ulcer patients and examined whether such predictors differ between patients with and without PAD.MethodsAnalyses were conducted within the EURODIALE Study, a prospective cohort study of 1,088 diabetic foot ulcer patients across 14 centres in Europe. Mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

60
656
8
46

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 856 publications
(798 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
60
656
8
46
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is no apparent biological basis for this finding or support from results of other studies 31, we think it is likely to be spurious.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…As there is no apparent biological basis for this finding or support from results of other studies 31, we think it is likely to be spurious.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Moreover, the presence of PAD and monophasic Doppler signals was correlated with delayed DFU ( p  = 0.004, OR = 0.43). These findings support those of previous studies that ESRD, smoking, and PAD delay DFU healing [12,34]. However, a greater number of DFUs progressed to full epithelization as judged by a podiatrist despite the presence of risk factors as illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although this resulted in the inclusion of explanatory variables previously shown to influence healing, e.g. baseline ulcer size, others such as age and sex were excluded [38]. Moreover, our secondary analyses were conducted on modest sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%