2007
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of overland flow and seepage zones associated with the interaction of multiple infiltration devices (cascading infiltration devices)

Abstract: Abstract:Infiltration devices are traditionally evaluated as standalone entities that do not interact with each other. A model is outlined that will allow interactions between proposed infiltration devices to be predicted prior to a development commencing. The model allows prediction of seepage into downslope devices and the assessment of the locations where the combined groundwater mound will reach the surface and result in overland flow. The volume of overland flow discharged by the seepage zone may exceed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies [1,2] of drainage failure associated with a Sustainable Urban Drainage Scheme (SUDS (Appendix 1, A.1)) at Greenloaning, Perthshire, Scotland, UK (Appendix 1, A.2), have identified that the infiltrating water is held in a sealed groundwater mound which does not dissipate over time into the underlying water table. Drainage failure events result [1][2][3] in high volume, high flow rate, overland flow ( Figure 1), and can lead to down slope flooding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies [1,2] of drainage failure associated with a Sustainable Urban Drainage Scheme (SUDS (Appendix 1, A.1)) at Greenloaning, Perthshire, Scotland, UK (Appendix 1, A.2), have identified that the infiltrating water is held in a sealed groundwater mound which does not dissipate over time into the underlying water table. Drainage failure events result [1][2][3] in high volume, high flow rate, overland flow ( Figure 1), and can lead to down slope flooding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference has significant implications for PRB design, particularly in impermeable or low permeability sediments. Static groundwater mounds are common in low permeability sediments [24][25][26][27]. When surface water runoff is directed to infiltration devices in impermeable/low permeability sediments, the infiltration devices will frequently contain static (standing) water between recharge events [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static groundwater mounds are common in low permeability sediments [24][25][26][27]. When surface water runoff is directed to infiltration devices in impermeable/low permeability sediments, the infiltration devices will frequently contain static (standing) water between recharge events [24][25][26][27]. The air-water contact represents the upper surface of a perched (self-sealing) ground water mound which extends spatially into the surrounding sediment [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The storm runoff water may be contaminated by nitrates (e.g., agricultural runoff), hydrocarbons/organic chemicals (road runoff/chemical runoff), salt (road runoff/irrigation project runoff) and metals (e.g., road runoff/industrial runoff/mining runoff) [92,94]. The infiltrating water will either flow directly into the water table [89,90], or into the water table via a descending groundwater mound [1,95], or into the water table by lateral propagation of a perched groundwater mound [96], or will form a perched sealed groundwater mound [1,2]. Surface runoff will form a perched water table confined to the upper layers of the topsoil [8,97], which may also intersect and enter the infiltration device.…”
Section: Remediation Of Storm Runoff/overland Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%