2006
DOI: 10.1080/10298430500502017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of pavement distress index with limited data on causal factors: an auto-regression approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DI value starts at 0, which indicates perfect pavement conditions. Although there is no upper limit for the DI value, the MDOT uses a threshold DI of 50 to indicate the need for pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction (Ahmed et al 2006). The authors used DI to determine the surface roughness of a pavement to calculate direct impact on vehicle energy consumption and environmental impacts (Lee et al 2002).…”
Section: Integrated Life-cycle Assessment and Life-cycle Cost Analysimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DI value starts at 0, which indicates perfect pavement conditions. Although there is no upper limit for the DI value, the MDOT uses a threshold DI of 50 to indicate the need for pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction (Ahmed et al 2006). The authors used DI to determine the surface roughness of a pavement to calculate direct impact on vehicle energy consumption and environmental impacts (Lee et al 2002).…”
Section: Integrated Life-cycle Assessment and Life-cycle Cost Analysimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant research on predicting the future pavement condition spanning over 40 years, certain challenges persist, including the need for high predictive power due to varying rates of deterioration influenced by geographical environment, climate, equivalent single axial load (ESAL), vehicle-type distribution, and material formulation characteristics [11][12][13][14][15]. Although some studies adopted the international roughness index (IRI) and the distress index, which can represent various distresses that occur on the road pavement surface [16][17][18], they could not achieve high predictive power due to the impact on material properties (ductility and brittleness) and traffic volume distribution. The NC-DoT (North Carolina Department of Transportation) in the U.S. is actively researching how to effectively maintain the 79,000-mile network in North Carolina through cost-benefit analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of the auto-regression model will depend on the number of lags used; for example, by using only one lag ( K = 1) in Equation 4 will result in an auto-regression model of order one, by using two lags ( K = 2) will result in an auto-regression model of order two, and so on. The goodness of the auto-regression model is reflected in the capabilities of incorporating an unknown factor that affects pavement deterioration, by including the previous pavement conditions to explain the present value ( 16 ).…”
Section: Pavement Performance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%