1998
DOI: 10.1179/026708398790290596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of plastic deformation and residual stresses induced in metallic parts by shot peening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guechichi's model was further improved by Khabou et al [12] and Fathallah et al [13]. The above works [10,12,13] have the advantage taking into account the majority of controlling process parameters have been taken into account.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guechichi's model was further improved by Khabou et al [12] and Fathallah et al [13]. The above works [10,12,13] have the advantage taking into account the majority of controlling process parameters have been taken into account.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guechichi's model was further improved by Khabou et al [12] and Fathallah et al [13]. The above works [10,12,13] have the advantage taking into account the majority of controlling process parameters have been taken into account. Based on a new model of spherical cavity expansion, Al-Obaid [14] developed a number of theoretical expressions for the process parameters to study the residual stress distribution in the target.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key differences between them lie in the kinetic energies and sizes of the balls and shots used in impacting. In shot peening, shots made of steel, ceramics, or glasses normally have sizes ranging from 200 to 500 mm with impact speeds of 20 to 100 m/s [11,12]. In contrast, steel or tungsten carbide balls with diameters of 4 to 10 mm are used in SNH, and their impact speeds typically vary from about 3 to 15 m/s [1-7, 10, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finiteelement method calculations developed in Reference 18 corroborated the analytical model for various cyclic loadings with different values of R and different residual-stress conditions (shot peening, laser shock peening, and lowplasticity burnishing), identifying an increase in stress relaxation with increasing load amplitude, increasing nearsurface cold working, and a more-negative load ratio. Other authors have concentrated on the theoretical modeling of stress relaxation and plastic deformation [20] or on the uniaxial behavior, [21] without performing systematic experimental investigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%