2015
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of potential disease-associated microRNAs based on random walk

Abstract: A web service for the prediction and analysis of disease miRNAs is available at http://bioinfolab.stx.hk/midp/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
141
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, HDMP is based on a local similarity measure rather than a global measure which can notably promote the prediction performance. Xuan et al [39] introduced another model called MIDP based on random walk, which exploited the characteristics of the nodes and the various ranges of topologies. The labeled nodes in MIDP were assigned higher transition weight than the unlabeled nodes, which efficiently exploited the prior information of nodes and various ranges of topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, HDMP is based on a local similarity measure rather than a global measure which can notably promote the prediction performance. Xuan et al [39] introduced another model called MIDP based on random walk, which exploited the characteristics of the nodes and the various ranges of topologies. The labeled nodes in MIDP were assigned higher transition weight than the unlabeled nodes, which efficiently exploited the prior information of nodes and various ranges of topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we applied three types of cross‐validations, namely, global leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV), local LOOCV and 5‐fold cross‐validation. To prove the effectiveness of the algorithm, KFRLSMDA was compared with 10 previous computational methods: MaxFlow, RKNNMDA, MiRAI, HDMP, RWRMDA, WBSMDA, HGIMDA, RLSMDA, MIDP and MCMDA . In LOOCV evaluation, each known association in the database was considered as the test sample in turn while the other known associations were viewed as training samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diseases were selected in our case studies because they are the most common cancer types, with high incidence and death rate each year. In addition, they have been used as case studies in many previous publications . Unlike cross‐validations that solely depended on HMDD v2.0, our case studies used HMDD v2.0 as the training database for KFRLSMDA and dbDEMC and miR2Disease as the validation databases for confirming the predicted potential associations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al . [34] developed a computational model of MI RNAs associated with D iseases P rediction (MIDP) and its extension version named MIDPE for the diseases with known related miRNAs and without any known related miRNAs, respectively. They established the transition matrices between the labeled and unlabeled nodes for exploring the prior information of nodes and the different ranges of topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%