Prediction of pre-eclampsia at St. Mary's hospital lacor, a low-resource setting in northern Uganda, a prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background Pre-eclampsia is the second leading cause of maternal death in Uganda. However, mothers report to the hospitals late due to health care challenges. Therefore, we developed and validated the prediction models for prenatal screening for pre-eclampsia. Methods This was a prospective cohort study at St. Mary's hospital lacor in Gulu city. We included 1,004 pregnant mothers screened at 16–24 weeks (using maternal history, physical examination, uterine artery Doppler indices, and blood tests), followed up, and delivered. We built models in RStudio. Because the incidence of pre-eclampsia was low (4.3%), we generated synthetic balanced data using the ROSE (Random Over and under Sampling Examples) package in RStudio by over-sampling pre-eclampsia and under-sampling non-preeclampsia. As a result, we got 383 (48.8%) and 399 (51.2%) for pre-eclampsia and non-preeclampsia, respectively. Finally, we evaluated the actual model performance against the ROSE-derived synthetic dataset using K-fold cross-validation in RStudio. Results Maternal history of pre-eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 32.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 6.59—182.05, p = 0.000), serum alkaline phosphatase(ALP) < 98 IU/L (aOR = 7.14, 95% CI 1.76—24.45, p = 0.003), diastolic hypertension ≥ 90 mmHg (aOR = 4.90, 95% CI 1.15—18.01, p = 0.022), bilateral end diastolic notch (aOR = 4.54, 95% CI 1.65—12.20, p = 0.003) and body mass index of ≥ 26.56 kg/m2 (aOR = 3.86, 95% CI 1.25—14.15, p = 0.027) were independent risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Maternal age ≥ 35 years (aOR = 3.88, 95% CI 0.94—15.44, p = 0.056), nulliparity (aOR = 4.25, 95% CI 1.08—20.18, p = 0.051) and white blood cell count ≥ 11,000 (aOR = 8.43, 95% CI 0.92—70.62, p = 0.050) may be risk factors for pre-eclampsia, and lymphocyte count of 800 – 4000 cells/microliter (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.08—1.22, p = 0.074) may be protective against pre-eclampsia. A combination of all the above variables predicted pre-eclampsia with 77.0% accuracy, 80.4% sensitivity, 73.6% specificity, and 84.9% area under the curve (AUC). Conclusion The predictors of pre-eclampsia were maternal age ≥ 35 years, nulliparity, maternal history of pre-eclampsia, body mass index, diastolic pressure, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, serum ALP and end-diastolic notch of the uterine arteries. This prediction model can predict pre-eclampsia in prenatal clinics with 77% accuracy.

Clinical study on the difference in intestinal microecology between patients with preeclampsia and pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy

“…The results of this study showed that the WBC count, N count, L count, and PLT count of preeclampsia pregnant women were significantly higher than those of pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy. The main reason for the increase of WBC during pregnancy is the increase of granulocytes caused by bone marrow proliferation and the left shift of the nucleus, that is, more immature WBC appears in the blood circulation ( Awor et al, 2023 ). Although the number of WBCs increased, the chemotaxis and adhesion function of WBCs decreased from the second trimester of pregnancy.…”

Laporan Kasus: Kembar Siam Tipe Heteropagus (Parasit)

“…Karena kebutuhan medis dan bedah mereka yang unik, pasienpasien ini memerlukan perawatan dari berbagai spesialisasi di pusat perawatan tersier dengan layanan yang lengka. 3 Kembaran parasit adalah anomali yang sangat langka. Insiden pastinya tidak diketahui namun diperkirakan terjadi kurang dari 1 dalam 1 juta kelahiran.…”

Randomized trial to compare acceptability of magnesium sulphate administration for preeclampsia and eclampsia: Springfusor pump versus standard of care

“…Globally, preeclampsia complicates approximately 2-8% of the pregnancies [2]. And in Uganda, the incidence of preeclampsia is 4.3% [3]. The presence of convulsions with preeclampsia indicates eclampsia.…”