1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(97)00149-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of pressure tube fretting-wear damage due to fuel vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was believed that turbulence-induced excitations may produce enough bundle vibration to cause wear in the supporting tube. However, Yetisir and Fisher (1997) pointed out that the small scale parallel-flow turbulence alone is not sufficient to produce the required level of bundle vibration and work-rate for the observed fretting marks on the pressure tube surface. Moreover, some recent studies report that the mixed parallel and cross flow through the various bundle subchannels and bundle interfaces can act as a potential source of FIV of fuel bundles (Zhang and Yu, 2011;Bhattacharya et al, 2011a;Bhattacharya et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fuel Bundle Vibration Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it was believed that turbulence-induced excitations may produce enough bundle vibration to cause wear in the supporting tube. However, Yetisir and Fisher (1997) pointed out that the small scale parallel-flow turbulence alone is not sufficient to produce the required level of bundle vibration and work-rate for the observed fretting marks on the pressure tube surface. Moreover, some recent studies report that the mixed parallel and cross flow through the various bundle subchannels and bundle interfaces can act as a potential source of FIV of fuel bundles (Zhang and Yu, 2011;Bhattacharya et al, 2011a;Bhattacharya et al, 2012).…”
Section: Fuel Bundle Vibration Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pettigrew (1993), in an experimental investigation on CANDU fuel bundle vibration, reported that the vibration amplitudes increase with the mass flow rates and the recorded RMS values of vibration response was within 10 μm. Yetisir and Fisher (1997) developed an analytical model for a single fuel element subjected to turbulence excitation modeled by random excitation forces applied uniformly on the fuel element. They found that the fuel element vibration due to the flow-induced random turbulent excitation is insufficient by itself to produce the required level of work rate causing the fretting damage observed in some commercial CANDU reactors.…”
Section: Analytical and Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is confirmed by the author through experiments (Zhang and Yu, 2008). Turbulence in parallel flows inside the bundle was regarded as the cause of vibration in the past; however it was proven that turbulence in the fully developed flow in a fuel bundle was insufficient to excite an individual fuel element to vibrate at the level that leads to the pressure tube fretting marks observed in the Darlington and Bruce reactors (Yetisir and Fisher, 1997). This indicates that an unknown stronger source of excitation must exist in the bundle flow.…”
Section: Pressure Tube Fretting and Fuel Bundle Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random vibration response of a fuel element in a turbulent parallel two-phase flow was modeled by Gorman (1971) with the measured statistical properties of the twodimensional pressure field surrounding the fuel element. Yetisir and Fisher (1997) presented a similar model for an individual CANDU fuel element in a turbulent flow that represents the typical fully developed flow inside a fuel bundle. They found that turbulence cannot excite the fuel element vibration to the level that can produce the observed fretting marks.…”
Section: Flow-induced Vibration Of Fuel Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W n is normalized by the input power induced by turbulence, W tur and the total power absorbed by a tube of length, L. Mass per unit length, m, was expressed by Yetisir and Fisher (1997).…”
Section: Dimensionless Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%