2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40030-022-00683-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Probability of Liquefaction Using Soft Computing Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have demonstrated promising results in terms of predictive accuracy. Moreover, the use of artificial neural network (ANN) prediction-based models, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models have been implemented to forecast soil liquefaction, resulting in improved prediction accuracy 28 – 30 . Other researchers have investigated the potential of extreme learning machines (ELM), a modified version of ANN, for predicting soil liquefaction 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies have demonstrated promising results in terms of predictive accuracy. Moreover, the use of artificial neural network (ANN) prediction-based models, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models have been implemented to forecast soil liquefaction, resulting in improved prediction accuracy 28 – 30 . Other researchers have investigated the potential of extreme learning machines (ELM), a modified version of ANN, for predicting soil liquefaction 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several researchers demonstrated the effectiveness of supervised learning methods in modeling unconfined compressive strength prediction of stabilized soils, showcasing the potential of ML techniques in simulating geotechnical properties under real conditions 39 . Moreover, other studies have predicted the potential for earthquake-induced liquefaction in fine-grained soil with minimal uncertainty and human intervention, showcasing the effectiveness of machine learning methods in evaluating liquefaction prediction performance for practical earthquake engineering applications 40 , 41 . These studies collectively illustrate the wide-ranging applicability of ML methods in geotechnical engineering domain, motivating further exploration of ML-based approaches for tackling soil liquefaction prediction challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have demonstrated promising results in terms of predictive accuracy. Moreover, the use of artificial neural network (ANN) prediction-based models, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models have been implemented to forecast soil liquefaction, resulting in improved prediction accuracy [24][25][26] . Other researchers have investigated the potential of extreme learning machines (ELM), a modified version of ANN, for predicting soil liquefaction 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree ensemble models (such as XGboost or extreme gradient boosting [GB]) are frequently recommended for classification and regression problems utilizing tabular data. [40][41][42][43][44] However, a number of proposed deep learning models utilizing tabular data asserted to perform better than XG-Boost in various use scenarios. In their latest study, Shwartz et al 45 evaluate the performance of novel deep learning models with ensemble-based models like XG-Boost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choosing which models to employ is a crucial step in resolving practical data science issues. Tree ensemble models (such as XG‐boost or extreme gradient boosting [GB]) are frequently recommended for classification and regression problems utilizing tabular data 40–44 . However, a number of proposed deep learning models utilizing tabular data asserted to perform better than XG‐Boost in various use scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%