“…The fact that perfluorinated ethers possess a larger radiative efficiency compared to the analogous perfluorocarbon has been known Table 1. BD and DD (both atomic units), harmonic vibrational frequencies (cm −1 ), IR intensities (km mol −1 ), total IR intensity, and IR intensity within the IR window for six perfluorinated molecules representative of six classes of global warming molecules (10,11,14,15), but the data in Table 1 show that this is for three main reasons: first, the C─F bond dipole is larger for CF 3 OCF 3 compared to CF 3 CF 3 , leading to larger IR intensities for the C-F stretches; second, the C─O bond dipole is very large, leading to large IR intensities for the C-O stretches, which fall into the IR window region (there is significant mixing between the C-O and C-F stretches, but a total energy distribution analysis shows that the bands at 1,205 and 1;301 cm −1 are mainly C-O stretches; see the SI Appendix); and third, because of the reduced symmetry in CF 3 OCF 3 compared to CF 3 CF 3 , there are four C-F stretching modes that have significant intensity, though the fourth-most intense mode at 972 cm −1 has an IR intensity of only 94 km mol −1 , compared with 755 km mol −1 for the most intense C-F stretch (note that this third component, symmetry, will not necessarily be present in larger perfluorcarbons where the molecular symmetry is lowered relative to CF 3 CF 3 ). Hence perfluorinated ethers possess enhanced IR intensities for the C-F stretches relative to perfluorocarbons, and they add two more C-O stretching modes with large IR intensities in the IRW.…”