Prediction of Response Patterns during Conditional Discrimination Training across Data Recording Methods

Platt, Delanie F.; Cariveau, Tom; Ellington, Paige; Brown, Alexandria

doi:10.1007/s40617-023-00778-0

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Participants completed a brief demographics survey and were provided instructions and an example data sheet before viewing the instructional video. The data sheets delineated the sample, comparison array, and discriminative stimulus for each trial consistent with enhanced data sheets (LeBlanc et al., 2020; Platt et al., 2023). The trial‐specific discriminative stimulus appeared in bold font.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An analysis of instructor‐ and tablet‐presented conditional discriminations: Fidelity and rapidity

Kennedy,

Cariveau,

Grelck

et al. 2023

Behavioral Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Matching‐to‐sample arrangements are commonly used to teach conditional discriminations. In these arrangements, instructors must systematically arrange instruction to ensure that a learner's response comes under the intended sources of stimulus control. Given the multitude of instructional considerations, the instructors' procedural fidelity has been a significant concern. Recently, LeBlanc et al. found that brief training and access to enhanced data sheets produced high levels of fidelity with experienced service providers. The current study extended LeBlanc et al. by examining the effects of a similar training on the fidelity and instructional pacing by participants with and without previous experience. The participants' performance was also compared when using a flashcard or binder (i.e., printed) arrays and relative to a tablet‐delivered instructional program. High levels of fidelity were observed following training, although pacing was slow. Slight differences in performance were observed across comparison arrays; nevertheless, the tablet‐based program outperformed instructors.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%