2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3mb70167k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of RNA binding proteins comes of age from low resolution to high resolution

Abstract: Networks of protein-RNA interactions is likely to be larger than protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction networks because RNA transcripts are encoded tens of times more than proteins (e.g. only 3% of human genome coded for proteins), have diverse function and localization, and are controlled by proteins from birth (transcription) to death (degradation). This massive network is evidenced by several recent experimental discoveries of large numbers of previously unknown RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Meanwhile,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(129 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many functional riboSNitches in mRNAs are likely to exert their effect by lowering the accessibility to RBPs or regulatory RNAs due to changes in the binding site of a target RNA. Recent in silico analyses of RNA‐binding preferences for a subset of RBPs clearly indicate that structure plays a central role in determining the binding affinity of some RBPs . A majority of RBPs with well‐characterized binding preferences have a high preference for single‐stranded RNA, and are observed to have a significantly lower binding affinity for structured RNA, even if the region contains the sequence motif critical for binding .…”
Section: Rna‐binding Proteins and The Ribosnitchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many functional riboSNitches in mRNAs are likely to exert their effect by lowering the accessibility to RBPs or regulatory RNAs due to changes in the binding site of a target RNA. Recent in silico analyses of RNA‐binding preferences for a subset of RBPs clearly indicate that structure plays a central role in determining the binding affinity of some RBPs . A majority of RBPs with well‐characterized binding preferences have a high preference for single‐stranded RNA, and are observed to have a significantly lower binding affinity for structured RNA, even if the region contains the sequence motif critical for binding .…”
Section: Rna‐binding Proteins and The Ribosnitchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPOT-seq 30 , template-based RNA-binding detection, was more accurate than other sequence or structure-based methods tested in 31…”
Section: Rna Bindingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A viable alternative to support and extend experimental‐ and sequence similarity–based approaches to elucidate putative RBPs is to use computational methods . A recent review summarizes two classes of methods that produce predictions from protein sequences and from protein structures . These methods not only identify RBPs but many of them also predict RNA binding residues and, in the case of the structure‐based methods, atomic level details of these interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%