2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-014-0505-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of rock mass along tunnels by geostatistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an advanced machine learning algorithm, NN represents an alternative to the well-established pool of response surface methods (see Li et al, 2016), such is the Kriging model, used because of its recognized ability to provide high quality predictions. However, some studies (Kaewkongkaew et al, 2015) showed that ordinary Kriging does not work well in estimating rock mass quality along tunnel alignments in complex geological settings. Further, Shi et al (2019) state that the NN surrogate model can accurately estimate the geological conditions prior to excavation when compared with the other soft computing methods, while Santos et al (2014) conclude that model errors obtained with the different estimation methods (linear regression, geostatistical Kriging and NN algorithms) are very similar.…”
Section: Development Of Netrheo Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an advanced machine learning algorithm, NN represents an alternative to the well-established pool of response surface methods (see Li et al, 2016), such is the Kriging model, used because of its recognized ability to provide high quality predictions. However, some studies (Kaewkongkaew et al, 2015) showed that ordinary Kriging does not work well in estimating rock mass quality along tunnel alignments in complex geological settings. Further, Shi et al (2019) state that the NN surrogate model can accurately estimate the geological conditions prior to excavation when compared with the other soft computing methods, while Santos et al (2014) conclude that model errors obtained with the different estimation methods (linear regression, geostatistical Kriging and NN algorithms) are very similar.…”
Section: Development Of Netrheo Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it has been used in the geotechnical domain (Brito et al 1997) and has been incorporated in many software offering custom-built surrogate models for fundamental aspects of uncertainty quantification, such as the open-access platform UQLab (2020). Despite being popular and providing relatively high accuracy, some geotechnical studies showed that ordinary Kriging did not work well in estimating rock mass quality along tunnel alignments in complex geological settings, with a large difference between the estimated and actual values (Kaewkongkaew et al 2015).…”
Section: An Architecture Of the Nettunn Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMR defines the geomechanical quality of a rock mass as the sum of five rates referred to the following rock and rock mass parameters: the uniaxial compression strength of rock matrix, the Rock Quality Designation (RQD), the discontinuity spacing, the condition of discontinuities and the water presence The use of the RMR index as a unique regionalized variable, as usually done [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], can constitute a conceptual mistake, because the RMR considers parameters with different origin, assigning them different weights, and so each parameter is not considered in an independent way. It is worth noting that, considering only the final RMR value and not the individual parameters, geostatistical analysis becomes easier and faster; this approach could be reasonable to assess the rock mass quality in a wide area and especially to individuate the critical sites without understanding why low RMR values occur, i.e.…”
Section: Local Rock Mass Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the indicator kriging needs an indicator transformation, which always implies a loss of information: the extra information about significant high or low values which fall within the same class is lost, actually whether a value is only a little bigger or very bigger than the chosen threshold does not play a role. The ordinary kriging, which has been already used two times in the RMR estimation [26,31], has been chosen to take in account the entire data set. The ordinary kriging is the technique that provides the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator of unknown fields [56,58], furthermore this method is a local estimator that provides the interpolation and extrapolation of the originally sparsely sampled data in the whole domain, assuming that the values are reasonably characterized by the Intrinsic Statistical Model.…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation