2009
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-09-00051.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Shoreline Recession Using Geospatial Technology: A Case Study of Chennai Coast, Tamil Nadu, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach carries the assumption that component errors are normally distributed (Dar and Dar, 2009). …”
Section: Shoreline Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach carries the assumption that component errors are normally distributed (Dar and Dar, 2009). …”
Section: Shoreline Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 70% beaches worldwide are in chronic erosion (Dar and Dar, 2009). Coastal erosion is also prevalent in China, with more than one third of shore-lines being eroded (Ji, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total shoreline position error was estimated using the equation: where n = shoreline number, E s is the error occurring from scale difference, E p is the photogrammetric error and E d is the digitising error. This approach carries the assumption that component errors are normally distributed (Dar & Dar 2009 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%