2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of slamming pressure considering fluid-structure interaction. Part II: Derivation of empirical formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other measurement cases with different drop heights and different locations from detailed numerical simulation data are compared with Chuang's results and Truong's further studies. [36][37][38] Three pressure gauges (P1;P3) and deflection gauges (D1;D3) listed in Tables 5 and 6 are considered in this verification study, which the detailed explanations of the experimental setup can be found in Chuang and Truong. The results of maximum pressure and deflection for all test cases (Tables 5 and 6) shown that the numerical model is reasonable.…”
Section: Validation Of Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other measurement cases with different drop heights and different locations from detailed numerical simulation data are compared with Chuang's results and Truong's further studies. [36][37][38] Three pressure gauges (P1;P3) and deflection gauges (D1;D3) listed in Tables 5 and 6 are considered in this verification study, which the detailed explanations of the experimental setup can be found in Chuang and Truong. The results of maximum pressure and deflection for all test cases (Tables 5 and 6) shown that the numerical model is reasonable.…”
Section: Validation Of Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%